report, it gives it to mps, mps tend to vote or whatever it recommends, but this afternoon the investigation into owen paterson has sparked this whole other debate about the way the system for policing mps and their conduct works in westminster. and this vote was put forward to try and change that, to set up a new committee, to look at the way it works and to effectively put mr paterson s suspension on hold. the government had put forward its strongest with. .. government had put forward its strongest with. i am joined by one of the conservative you did not vote things in why not? vote for the amendment. i things in why not? vote for the amendment- amendment. i did not think it was the riaht amendment. i did not think it was the right thing amendment. i did not think it was the right thing to amendment. i did not think it was the right thing to do. amendment. i did not think it was the right thing to do. i amendment. i did not think it was the right thing to do. i was - a
mps should outsource conduct matters to a technocrat. but, it is a very difficult situation, very difficult story with 0wen patterson and dealing with the allegations in the suspensions. but that s of the due process is pursued and we get the right outcome. . this process is pursued and we get the right outcome. . right outcome. . this like due rocess right outcome. . this like due process to right outcome. . this like due process to you, right outcome. . this like due process to you, james? - right outcome. . this like due process to you, james? this | right outcome. . this like due - process to you, james? this smells to hiuh process to you, james? this smells to high heaven. process to you, james? this smells to high heaven. it process to you, james? this smells to high heaven. it looks process to you, james? this smells to high heaven. it looks like - process to you, james? this smells to high heaven. it looks like a - process to you, james? this smells to high heaven. it
where the money sllocated what states. so slowly the new temporary conservator is going to have to go to each entity where money i kept or investments made and assert his authority and dominion over those assets. it s probably going to take him about a month to do that. it s a long it process. yeah, so we know brittany wants control over her decisions personal and professional does she have that power now in this arrangement? not quite. suspending conservator her father, didn t mean she s been restored to all of her civil rights. so she would still have to use the temporary conservator to make decisions, to enter into contracts. so she s not quite there. the next step, november 12th is when the conservatorship is hopefully
fell by weight or political bargaining and a deal, not by way of arms. bargaining and a deal, not by way of arms- bargaining and a deal, not by way of arms. you talk about it as a political way of arms. you talk about it as a political solution, - as a political solution, goodness me, we have seen the pictures at kabul airport, people trying to hang on to the views are large of an aeroplane and full to their death in a process, that s no solution of any sort, is it? it process, that s no solution of any sort, is it? any sort, is it? it is a very afghan any sort, is it? it is a very afghan solution, - any sort, is it? it is a very afghan solution, and - any sort, is it? it is a very afghan solution, and it s. any sort, is it? it is a very i afghan solution, and it s not to dismiss our shortcomings in the execution of the president s decision. and again, ithink president s decision. and again, i think you took responsibility for that. i also think in the face of this unexpected swee
seconds. it s a modest force for all of that seems to me to be a prudent decision and how you are going to secure the american people. bret: just a few seconds. do you think the trump administration would do something different in exiting this than the biden administration has done? well, i m not even convinced that president trump would eventually have exited even though it obviously was part of his campaign. i mean, i can t do anything but speculate about that. i don t know for sure. listen, i do know when made the decision to leave, bret it, should have been a lot of other issues on the table, what are we going to do to prevent the taliban from taking over. because you can t convince me that president biden has any interest in the taliban running afghanistan with all the geopolitical significance that has in dealing with our adversaries and our allies, certainly. that s not on his agenda. so what was the it process how too we prevent that from happening?