irs. and with less than two yearsd tl to go until the twenty twenty four election, democrats are once again shockingle y playing the race card. this time, they re trying to vilify the entire sunshine. state of florida. but first tonight, all eyes areh on the biden white house where joe is still refusing to come ta to terms on a debt ceiling that is , well, pretty imminent.t ist according to democrats, the sky. is falling. the american economyaccordin, the world s economy is about to collapse. and it s all kevin mccarthy s fault. when in fact, it s anything but kevin mccarthy s fault. so why didn t democrats care so deeply about this issue? over. one hundred days ago whens speaker mccarthy was all but begging the white house, you know, weekly, monthly, dayy after da y to sit down and negotiate this? take a look. we have to negotiatek. overtiat. the debt. our whole government is designed to have compromise. our governrepublican control. the house democrats have a small majo
Consensus reached after multiple days and meetings among officials. We reviewed Department Policies and concluded Assistant Director pre steps exercise of description in opening the investigation was in compliance with those policies. We also reviewed, as we detail in the report, the emails, Text Messages and other documents of those involved in that decision, particularly mr. Pre steps. We didnt find documentary or Testimonial Evidence that indicated political bias or improper motivation influencing his decision to open the investigation. While the information in the fbis possession at the time was limited, in light of the Throw Threshold established by department and fbi predication policy which, by the way, is not a legal requirement but a prudential one in the fbi and Department Policies, we found that Crossfire Hurricane was opened for an authorized
investigative purpose and with sufficient factual predication. This decision to open Crossfire Hurricane which involved the activitie
i d say it s probably time ob forably t it to go if they re abusinggo that power. if yeah, t you listen over a quarter million times over a two year period abuse this fisa authority, section seven or two . and sean, if you remember the first story that i didt stoy on your show, unraveling russia, collusion was in march 2017. it was about the same tool being abused back home. and here we are. six years later, the fbi has only augmented the amount of abuses. there s been no corrective action by the department that actually has an effect. they say they take corrective ct action, but the problems keep getting worse.action and congress hasn t really done anything to punish the fbi. miranda s right. i think there s no there is noos reason to be deterred becausone they never really get punished. the only way they re goingpuni to get punished right now is isf someone takes a big chunk of their budget to get their attention. miranda reading the new york post, your paper today. b i really enjo
supporting probable cause. further, the agents and supervisory agents did not follow or even appear to know certain basic requirements in the woods procedures. although we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct, we also did not receive satisfactory explanations for any of the errors or omissions we identified. we found and as we outline here, are deeply concerned that so many basic and fundamental errors were made by three separate hand picked investigative teams on one of the most sensitive fbi investigations after the matter had been briefed to the highest levels within the fbi, even though the information sought through the use of fisa authority related so closely to an ongoing presidential campaign, and even though those involved with the investigation knew that their actions would likely be subjected to close
hill. my panel is here. page three we found no evidence that the fbi attempted to place human resources within the trump campaign, recruit members of the trump campaign or task any human resources to report on the trump campaign. however, geoff bennett, michael horowitz will go on to say under applicable department policy it would have been fisht for a first-level fbi supervisor to have authorized such a thing. so, this is sort of a report on this could have been really bad but it wasn t. reporter: you re right about that, chuck. that caught my eye, too. we are deeply concerned so many basic and fundamental errors were made by three hand-picked investigative teams on one of the most sensitive fbi investigations after the matter had been briefed to the highest levels in the fbi even though the information sought through fisa authority related so closely to an ongoing presidential campaign and it goes on from there.