different types of attacks on trans people. so the forest outing that you mentioned are often combined with efforts to ban medically supported an evidence based healthcare leading up to 2023. we had two states that it s statutorily ban medical care that is supported by every major medical associations in the united states as of april of 2023 11, more states have banned that care. this is on top of the efforts that we re seeing, too. criminally target drag performance and other protected first amendment activity, including books in schools and curricula. we are seeing these broad based attacks on our community that are only escalating and the consequences of these. the practical consequences of these are that parents are not able to support their children. young people are not able to go to school and feel safe and adolescents are struggling to find out whether or not they can even maintain the health care that they need. this is a crisis in the community in his only escalating it s tou
merely for traveling to the capitol january 6 we re not opening up cases for people going down to a political rally. house judiciary democrats said it s marred by substantial bias and lacks credibility. an fbi spokesperson said the fbi will never open an investigation based solely on first amendment activity. a nonprofit group representing hill told cnn to wait for the official transplant before reporting on selective part sin leak a third said he was tripped of his clearance after making an unauthorized media disclosure describes this, many points he refused to elaborate or offer democrats corroborating evidence. his attorney a former election attorney for donald trump told cnn his client provided information to congress. but he did not release that information to democrats on the committee because he knew they
communities devastated by natural disasters, and let that sink in. the fbi denied the claim saying the fbi cannot designate domestic terrorist organizations and can never open an investigation based on first amendment activity. take a look at this, horrifying home invasion caught on camera. [recording playing] todd: imagine that is your mom, your grandma, two men holding a couple atun gunpoint and locking the victims in the closet. carley: crime in san francisco so bad one survey shows half of all residents have been robbed. our next guest lived in the city his entire life, but that issue of crime forced him to leave.
because project veritas told him to go back in and take additional items and was basically part of that scheme, because of that role should they bring charges? with the first amendment, does the first amendment protect them at all? i think what some legal experts will say that as a news organization, you can be in receipt, you can take and stolen property. the stuff that edward snowden took from the nsa was all stolen from the nsa. it s not like the nsa just donated it to edward snowden who then gave it to the press. so the question is that, if these individuals who say they were engaged in first amendment activity, they were working for project veritas directed them to do this and then claim a role legally in the scheme to illegally obtain the stolen property, would the government go ahead and try to bring charges? all we know in that area is
because of that role should they bring charges? with the first amendment, does the first amendment protect them at all? i think what some legal experts will say that as a news organization, you can be in receipt, you can take and stolen property. the stuff that edward snowden took from the nsa was all stolen from the nsa. it s not like the nsa just donated it to edward snowden who then gave it to the press. so the question is that, if these individuals who say they were engaged in first amendment activity, they were working for