In citywide fees, 77 in central soma fees and in our case and many of our peers have similar fees, 79 of project fees and concessions. Thats over 200 of concessions in the project. If you look at the numbers that mr. Eagan just presented if we are building 430,000 square feet a year and lose 120, the job housing linkage fee would be the same but you would lose 200 per square foot or 24 million per year of public benefits. We urge continuance and continued dialogue on this one. Thank you mr. Shannon. 2700 block of california is it about scott street . I would pose to you those people are actually going to tech jobs on the peninsula and had the peninsula built housing, they would be living next to their jobs right now. The floor is yours. Thank you supervisor. Mike from realty corporation. I completely agree that none of you who support this measure are trying to eliminate jobs in San Francisco. That was a good clarification. The goal is to generate revenue for the city of San Francisco.
Office growth. Its not at all connected to or analyzing the pipeline that we already have. Because we know that there are very large projects that are jumping all over each other to try to take whats available under prop m which is expected to at least in the next few years, in the near term, be a lot higher than much closer to the full prop m. I think the challenge we have now is having enough, year over year, because theres way more than the 950,000 that we have available. So i want to be clear the analysis is not connected to the actual pipeline that is existing now. Its based on the past and tends to be a long term forward look assuming the citys economy is as favorable as its been over the past 20 years for office. And to the extent that we bump into the prop m limit, the impact of projects being infeasible above that limit or rendered infeasible by this increase would not have any impact. They would simply be punted into the next year or at some future point when Market Condition
Kingdom back in london and in the house of commons and in a majority. These are home made problems. America says new evidence proves iran was behind the attacks which wiped out nearly half of saudis oil production. Two former British Army Soldiers win a Racial Discrimination case against the ministry of defence. The uks former chief scientists said recent extreme weather is scary. And stop feeding the trolls celebrities line up to ignore and block online abuse. Good evening. In another day of political drama, Boris Johnson good evening. In another day of political drama, borisjohnson has held his first talks as Prime Minister with the president of the European Commission, Jean Claude Juncker. After, mrjohnson told the bbc he was confident a deal could be done, that the eu had had a bellyful of brexit and they were fed up with the endless delays. Earlier Jean Claude Juncker said it was the endless delays. Earlier jean claudejuncker said it was the uks responsibility to come forward with
Reporter thats right. Here at the celebration i have to keep my voice a bit low. Its described as a milestone. Supervisors have been talking, but the man being called the visionary behind this entire project started the work 26 years ago says the striping version is like a mini version of the old scurve. The lets look at the video. You can see heading into the brandnew southbound tunnel the second of two short periods of tunnels, you may notice on the right, the striping appears to veer left. The lead architect says hes not a traffic engineer but as anyone can see, that setup is not, quote, desirable, and he wants more signage. Project leaders counter this is a temporary element, and all planned work was done and done early. Crews had to create a safety shoulder to offer a workspace as it continued to building a retaining wall between the two tunnels. It had all been so smooth and even and suddenly you have to make this turn it seems like what is this, i didnt it was a construction pha
The main news in westminster, thejudges have spoken. Its up to parliament to make a decision on triggering brexit. I can announce today that we will shortly introduce legislation allowing the government to move ahead with invoking article 50, which starts the formal process of withdrawing from the european union. Some mps want to be clear about what they are voting for. I would like a white paper which we can debate. It will bring us together, i would say to my right honourable friend. What does my right honourable friend have to lose with a debate on it . Also on the programme, the government is refusing to talk about a failed Trident Missile Test, but there are other sources. I could phone up mr putin can i did a favour for him once rescuing his submariners when they were drowning and im sure he would tell me. I surely would know the date. But first, the Supreme Court has ruled that parliament would need formal approval before leaving the european union. Explaining the decision of a