i think also it shows how worried they are about this election. this wedge issue on contraception shows they are looking at the numbers on women and think we have a huge problem. we have to do a lot more fundraising and figure out a way to get him out every day. to be making comments that will get them to squeak by. that is, i think the hope is squeak by in 2012. eric: we talk about how they mismanage expectations all the time. they did with the fundraising number. the fundraising number is way down. he set the bar at $1 billion. getting back to the movement question, bob can t articulate what the movement is. bob: i didn t get a chance to. andrea: we can articulate what the movement is. that is spreading the wealth, demonizing the rich. that is a movement he is referring to. he iser if vently pushing that movement down our throats. bob: you said he demonized all the 1%er. classic conservative statement. has he demonized all the 1%? andrea: he has. bob: show me where he say
provide contraception. dana: i m not a conspiracy theorist, but it s strange, george stephanopoulos asked a question about contraception that i thought mitt romney answered well in the debate. i thought what are you talking about? then there was a contraceptive in january. santorum, you re right, he has to defend what he said in the past about it. how did we get to this point? greg: you have to understand what is more important than apartheid is making sure that people can have recreationm sex and we subsidize it. eric: how does mitt romney get around the mandate of the contraception in the healthcare plan? andrea: i don t know the details are about that. andrea: i don t care what they do in the state. bob: we agree the massachusetts thing he signed is a problem for him. a problem that planned parenthood was on the board. bob: but i m saying he is slightly pregnant on this issue. borrow a phrase. andrea: he gave birth to that baby.
interimly the poll number what is they see is what i expect they would see is the republicans moving back to things like contraception and values is driving women back to the democratic party. greg: it s not about contraception. it s about the government overreach. every time they get in that debate it becomes about contraceptive. andrea: today republicans are forced to defend comments of radio talk show host and put on the defensive rather than going on the offensive about the economy. republicans make a great point. they can t take the bait on this one and be distracted. bob: he made this a big deal because he was a front runner. andrea: he s asked about it at every dana: not only that, the obama healthcare bill mandates after the religious institutions and cross the line on religious freedom is what started it. eric: which was januar january 20. this is new a mandate that sebelius said this is how we ll interpret obamacare. every institution has to
provide contraception. dana: i m not a conspiracy theorist, but it s strange, george stephanopoulos asked a question about contraception that i thought mitt romney answered well in the debate. i thought what are you talking about? then there was a contraceptive in january. santorum, you re right, he has to defend what he said in the past about it. how did we get to this point? greg: you have to understand what is more important than apartheid is making sure that people can have recreationm sex and we subsidize it. eric: how does mitt romney get around the mandate of the contraception in the healthcare plan? andrea: i don t know the details are about that. andrea: i don t care what they do in the state. bob: we agree the massachusetts thing he signed is a problem for him. a problem that planned parenthood was on the board. bob: but i m saying he is slightly pregnant on this issue. borrow a phrase. andrea: he gave birth to
i think also it shows how worried they are about this election. this wedge issue on contraception shows they are looking at the numbers on women and think we have a huge problem. we have to do a lot more fundraising and figure out a way to get him out every day. to be making comments that will get them to squeak by. that is, i think the hope is squeak by in 2012. eric: we talk about how they mismanage expectations all the time. they did with the fundraising number. the fundraising number is way down. he set the bar at $1 billion. getting back to the movement question, bob can t articulate what the movement is. bob: i didn t get a chance to. andrea: we can articulate what the movement is. that is spreading the wealth, demonizing the rich. that is a movement he is referring to. he iser if vently pushing that movement down our throats. bob: you said he demonized all the 1%er. classic conservative statement. has he demonized all the 1%? andrea: he has. bob: show me where he say