they will come back to haunt both the president and roger stone. why? why is that extremely unwise? because, look, when we look at these indictments, the stone indictment for example, i ll tell you, chris, 30 years as a fer federal prosecutor, i ve drafted more indictments than i can recall. but one thing i can tell you, when we indict one person, roger stone, we do a relatively modest indictment. so, for example, if roger was roger stone was indicted for a witness tampering charge, the indictment on that count would read something like, you know, on january 1st, 2019, in the district of columbia, defendant roger stone tampered with a witness by trying to interfere with the witness truthful testimony before a proceeding. period. right. what we have the roger stone indictment, chris, is a conspiracy indictment. there is no conspiracy charge contained in it, but it sets out the misconduct and the complicity of so many other people, of corsi, of credico,