they will come back to haunt both the president and roger stone. >> why? why is that extremely unwise? >> because, look, when we look at these indictments, the stone indictment for example, i'll tell you, chris, 30 years as a fer federal prosecutor, i've drafted more indictments than i can recall. but one thing i can tell you, when we indict one person, roger stone, we do a relatively modest indictment. so, for example, if roger was -- roger stone was indicted for a witness tampering charge, the indictment on that count would read something like, you know, on january 1st, 2019, in the district of columbia, defendant roger stone tampered with a witness by trying to interfere with the witness' truthful testimony before a proceeding. period. >> right. >> what we have the roger stone indictment, chris, is a conspiracy indictment. there is no conspiracy charge contained in it, but it sets out the misconduct and the complicity of so many other people, of corsi, of credico,