When i first moved to the bay area, more than 30 years ago, i got on bart and was told to get off at the glen park bart station. It is the pleasure of fabulous architecture. You suddenly have experienced a building and you really experience that one. It is a stunning building. It is so worthy. I agree with what the prior two commissioners have said and i do wonder, at this jewel, this stunning piece of architecture is going 47 years without significant alteration and 47 years without any cleaning. [laughter] i would like to make a motion to approve adopt the resolution to adopt the approval. I seconded. Thank you. If theres nothing further, theres a motion that has been seconded to adopt a recommendation for approval. On that motion. [roll call] so moved. That passes unanimously 50. This is an informational presentation. Good afternoon, commissioners i am from planning staff. With me today are lily and alison, also with the Planning Department. The purpose of todays presentation is to
So i do not support this motion. I think we have to act with urgency. I think it is high time we have an oversight body for a department that has ever expanding budget. Ironically, it was the mayor who didnt support prop c because she said there wasnt enough oversight over the department. So how all of us are not supporting this department right now is absolutely beyond me. So i would encourage all of my colleagues to not support the motion to delay this to march and to act with the urgency that our constituents demand and deserve. President yee supervisor mandelman . Supervisor mandelman thank you, president yee. I want to echo thanks to supervisor haney for the leadership youve provided on a number of issues, and particularly on the sea wall Navigation Center. I think that was a courageous act and the leadership that you provided there is something i think everyone in city hall should be grateful for. I would be grateful for more time on this, this commission. And although again with
I know that i mentioned this to you before and im very happy that youre looking at some of the solutions. And in a way, youre addressing it. There is other issues that i would have enjoyed bringing to the attention to make amendments to it, but i realize and this is my fault i cant really make amendments at this point, because of the our dates. So, im kind of glad the mayor and the stakeholders have reached some key agreements of both to both continue to discuss the need of the critical changes for more responsive department as well as some immediate policy changes to improve the quality of peoples lives right now. Not after november and beyond. Such as a change in the definition of homeless mothers. In support of that discussion, i really well, id like to make a motion to amend the date to march 3, 2020. This will provide us with the breathing room to get everyone to the table and develop a way forward. It accomplishes the objective that we all shared to make our citys work to end hom
State owned land. The legislation were considering today is a sensible expansion of the planning code that will allow for Farmers Markets to seek authorization to open on other public facilities, such as city and state owned lands. We currently allow intermittent activities like Farmers Market at hospitals and postsecondary institutions and its surprising we dont allow them on other Government Owned Properties like the d. M. V. Parking lot on baker street. The Farmer Market has contracted with the d. M. V. , but it could not make the move under current zoning. Making this change today will allow the market to expand and serve the interests of the residents of district 5. The Pacific Coast Farmers Market association is a good neighbor. And theyve created markets that are accessible to all. Every vendor at this market accepts snap benefits and the market managers are considered members of the community. This move and expansion theyre proposing has the full support of the northern of the
Consider this to be the jewel of the bart system, then you have to actually have some information on the bart system. I think we should include under criteria a, as well. Thing here. Thank you. I wholeheartedly agree. When i first moved to the bay area, more than 30 years ago, i got on bart and was told to get off at the glen park bart station. It is the pleasure of fabulous architecture. You suddenly have experienced a building and you really experience that one. It is a stunning building. It is so worthy. I agree with what the prior two commissioners have said and i do wonder, at this jewel, this stunning piece of architecture is going 47 years without significant alteration and 47 years without any cleaning. [laughter] i would like to make a motion to approve adopt the resolution to adopt the approval. I seconded. Thank you. If theres nothing further, theres a motion that has been seconded to adopt a recommendation for approval. On that motion. [roll call] so moved. That passes unan