end. and the argument gets diluted along the way. people get really tired of watching the two sides argue. and i think that s, you know, earlier you were saying, you know, that the democrats say one thing and backtrack, and trump says something about mexico aing for the wall, and backtracks. this is why people have a real problem with politicians is because they re on camera, saying things, and then they change their story. what is the problem with just saying yes, i said that. but things have changed, and i now say something different. nobody will go along and admit that what they said was incorrect, and they want to say something different going forward. i think that this is part of the problem, why you can t just go ahead and change your story. and it s okay, it s okay to have that. neil: i remember that, ronald reagan, i evolved on that position. he was tack talking about starting out as an fdr democrat,
warrants president trump: i don t know what they have planned, i would do. that i would do it, i would stop there if we could, you have to ask the secret service. i would certainly thank, high, folks. i would stop there. i wouldn t mind. it s not a bad idea, i wouldn t mind if you want to do that. [inaudible. [ creme rats aren t moving president trump: if you read one of your competitors they ll tell you that the democrat starting to say this is not an argument they can win, are some of the very young, very smart democrats that just got elected to congress. and i don t know if you saw the same story that i did, but they re saying this is not an argument we re going to win. this is a common sense argument. now, if for any reason we don t get it going and they re not going to sk act responsibly and they don t mind debt and crime and the problems that they cause by not having a barrier, then you will see what happens with national emergency.
check. but he has said just that. if i m a democrat wouldn t i say, wait a minute, you just lied. well, they ve already called us all liars, anyway. neil: back and forth, right. yeah, right. and the bottom line is that the american public, they want our borders secure, it s the federal government s responsibility neil: but the mexicans under this president they said would pick up the bill. well, yes, he did. and i don t know what kind of deal that he thinks that he can do or is going to do in order to make sure that mexico pays for the bill. but we know the money all comes out of the general fund, the federal government. they need to get it done. neil: maybe there was something to what he said about we have this trade deal, still not ratified, but a trade deal that would create some of the revenue, is that what he meant
that i m not going to get into my private conversations with the president. all americans know vladimir putin lies. he s a former kgb agents. that s what they do. i agree on you what could be positive outcomes in syria, in ukraine on trade with a russia. there are very serious issues there. would you also agree that another positive outcome from the discussions would be to say, to stop them from meddling in u.s. elections? of course. i think it s it would be great to get them to stop meddling in all elections. they re trying to attack democracy as an institution. and they re trying to demonstrate to fragile regimes that they re autocrat style is better than our democrat style. we need to have offensive and defensive systems in place to be able to deal with this as a global strategy. great point. get on the russians. you may want to get on the president to get on them as well. i do want to ask you about something you were uniquely positioned to tell us about which is this 11