They are engaging. The issue for us is our ability and they talk about it with the United States and the prc has, and that is the existing world power and how did you operate together and solve disputes in a peaceful manner under international norms. The indications that they are continuing to try to solve those in an aggressive way we would not agree with. Some with relation to the philippines are disconcerting, and we think that is the wrong way to go. There are other cases where they are engaged and things are handled in a more appropriate way. It is kind of a National Strategy with china, which i am not sure how you would answer what the true united National Strategy is with respect to this prc. There is a case where we are looking at both sides of that someenge, is that there is kind of movement in their territorial game. I will merge a number of questions together. One is a lot of bilateral engagements, and most of your answers were bilateral in their description. Theres probably
Its funding catholic relief services, search for Common Ground and mercy corps. They could respond quickly. They turned around in a matter of weeks. Thats a great tool we really think should be scaled up, at least 100 million, and beyond Rapid Response structure but finding, looking at priorities and how we can have more block of prevention. On your question of the Transitional Government, i think from my perception on the ground and from our Staff Perceptions there still is safe and optimism in the Transitional Government but it is waning as we mentioned that what we prioritize is that she has, the Transitional Government has a support package to pay civil sellers and restore basic a state function so that they can begin to provide services. We are happy with the world banks announcement earlier this week which will be an initial seller payment but it small. We think the imf really needs to get involved and we heard that they plan to send their Assessment Team in july which we think i
That does not mean that you cannot do it in a thoughtful way. That is what we try to do. Lots of other organizations try to do the same thing. So, you just have to decide. Where are you going to expend your energy . Some people spend all day long with cable news on. It palays a role. That is a great place to go on a breaking story. But, there are also a lot of talking heads. We said, toasy as tune into the people that you agree with. There are people on both sides of the spectrum. People are guilty of that. Just listening to people who affirm your beliefs. I think that the more that you demand and reward more thoughtful journalism, the more you will get. Back to the issue of Foreign Policy, when you are making or your editors are making k at anns, do you loo issue through the prism of our americans interested in the ukraine story . Obviously, theres a lot of interest in that now. Or do you say here is a Foreign Policy story that is of monumental importance. There is no question that th
This is not serious. This is no way to decide who leads the most powerful nation on earth. Here on the show, we will be different. We will focus on policy. Not scandal. Election is a choice, not just between two people, but between two visions of america and to policy. Every sunday we will set up the choice on a different aspect of whats at stake. We will talk about coronavirus. Heres a choice. Based on the facts as we all know, the virus started in china initially denied and covered up before they let the virus spread around the world even as the regime shut down travel within china. Here, as we know, President Trump understood how serious this was there is a massive point missing from the media of historical misinformation. Yes the president s public statements were designed to avoid panic. So where doctor county and the cdc, even the biden campaign. They warned as late as mid february about a fear. [inaudible] many more lies about. We could go on and on. That was jake tapper immedia
This is no way to decide who leads the most powerful nation on earth. Here on the show, we will be different. We will focus on policy. Not scandal. Election is a choice, not just between two people, but between two visions of america and to policy. Every sunday we will set up the choice on a different aspect of whats at stake. We will talk about coronavirus. Heres a choice. Based on the facts as we all know, the virus started in china initially denied and covered up before they let the virus spread around the world even as the regime shut down travel within china. Here, as we know, President Trump understood how serious this was there is a massive point missing from the media of historical misinformation. Yes the president s public statements were designed to avoid panic. So where doctor county and the cdc, even the biden campaign. They warned as late as mid february about a fear. [inaudible] many more lies about. We could go on and on. That was jake tapper immediately after a Trump Pr