That does not mean that you cannot do it in a thoughtful way. That is what we try to do. Lots of other organizations try to do the same thing. So, you just have to decide. Where are you going to expend your energy . Some people spend all day long with cable news on. It palays a role. That is a great place to go on a breaking story. But, there are also a lot of talking heads. We said, toasy as tune into the people that you agree with. There are people on both sides of the spectrum. People are guilty of that. Just listening to people who affirm your beliefs. I think that the more that you demand and reward more thoughtful journalism, the more you will get. Back to the issue of Foreign Policy, when you are making or your editors are making k at anns, do you loo issue through the prism of our americans interested in the ukraine story . Obviously, theres a lot of interest in that now. Or do you say here is a Foreign Policy story that is of monumental importance. There is no question that th
Litigation regulate speech in order to give adversarial parties a fair and equal thertunity to persuade decisionmaker to roll in their favor, rules regulating political campaigns should have the same objective. Theelections, decisionmakers are voters. Not judges or jurors. That does not change the imperative or the equality of opportunity. Second, all elected officials would lead happier lives and be better able to perform their if theyesponsibilities did not have to spend so much time raising money. Limiting Campaign Contributions and expenditures should recognize the distinction between money provided by their constituents and money provided by nonvoters. Corporations and People Living in other jurisdictions. An important recent opinion written by judge Brett Kavanaugh of the d c circuit, and summarily affirmed by th Supreme Court, upheld the constitutionality of the federal statute that prohibits foreign citizens from spending money to support or oppose candidates for federal office