breast, anybody can make up the story but to me as a physician that s taken history after history, it has the ring of truth to it. one more thing. this also speaks to janice s point, there s a profile here, psychological profile of someone who may feel he s better than other people, beyond other people. other people are subhuman. people don t have to be factored in, whether it s a nursing home victims or whether it s women in his employee. harris: we have got leo terrel. you talked about one of those great attorneys. he s a fox news contributor, he joined the last hour as the attorney for andrew cuomo, soon-to-be ex-governor of new york in about 14 days. as that story was breaking with her laying out the defense. leo, i have a question about what could happen next and why do you think the doj dropped its case against this governor that s facing so many allegations? thank you for having me again, harris.
0 arm, a pat on the face, a touch on the stomach, a slap on the back. it s my way of saying i see you. i appreciate you, and i thank you. i m not comfortable just walking past and ignoring them. of course, usually they are male troopers. in this case, i don t remember doing it at all. i didn t do it consciously with the female trooper. i did not mean any sexual connotation. it was totally thoughtless in the literal sense of the word. but it was also insensitive. it was embarrassing to her, and was disrespectful. it was a mistake, plain and simple. i have no other words to explain it. i want to personally apologize to her and her family. i have greatest respect for her and for the new york state police. now, obviously in a highly political matter like this, there are many agendas and there are many motivations at play. if anyone thought otherwise google would be naive and nenew yorkers are not naive. i want to thank the women who came forward since your complaint. it s not easy to ste
and that s factored in, we expect that regardless of sort of policy decisions from here forward? so that s very much dependent on whether we follow the paris agreement or not. reporter: the paris agreement s goal is to sufficiently cut carbon emissions to keep the average global temperature increase below two degrees. that s to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. scientists say achieving that goal will limit rising sea levels from expanding water and melting ice sheets. but it s already too late to prevent it. scientists say even if some of the best-case forecasts prove accurate, this big, impressive piece of infrastructure still has a limited shelf life. sea level rise means long before the end of this century, it will have to be replaced by a new, bigger, hugely expensive barrier further downstream. these ten yearly forecasts show what will happen to london if it doesn t have a barrier and the world doesn t act quickly to cut
i think this is what they are looking for for answers. it is not hearsay. ambassador sondland had direct calls and talks with president trump. one of them heard by two separate aides who have testified behind closed doors, to hearing, they say, the president on this call talking to ambassador sondland. those questions specifically about whether, as the democrats say, bribery, quid pro quo, and whether this all factored in, will come to gordon sondland directly come thursday. harris: when you look at the politics of the impeachment inquiry, there are a couple of things at least as we wrapped up on friday, from those first three witnesses that popped. one was the fund-raising letter that the trump campaign, the trump-pence keep america great 2020 campaign sent out. their original goal was $3 million. they were asking for $5 million on friday because they met that
look, we are not going to give the president everything, but we have to compromise somewhere. one of the things you hear from his aides at this point is they are not talking about a wall in the ways he is talking b. here s mick mulvaney again talking about a barrier. we are building a barrier. that s why the government is closed. the president is not willing to give up on the southern barrier. the moral thing to do is keep it shut down until you get a wall. how in tune to you to the compromise that makes it look like the republicans are caving again. that is a real thing that has to be factored in, right? we are not compromising on the importance of border security. there you have it again. the fox guy talking about the wall and mulvaney talking about barriers and border security.