visitation, the mother suspended all visitation. judges do not look kindly when a parent disobeys a court order. number one. number two, during the original hearing where he got visitation, the victim recanted, and when i say recanted, pam. i m talking about the 6-year-old stepdaughter. he went to prison for molesting, she actually came to court all of these years later and said, it never happened. he did not molest me. that also factored in, and lastly, there are those allegations that you just talked about. where the little girl returned and said, her 19-year-old stepbrother touched her and the judge said they defined absolutely, could find absolutely no evidence and tended to think ms. knight was making those up. i m not saying i agree with his decisions but those are the factor was are hearing cited for this very controversial decision to give this little girl to her dad. in the midst of this controversy, wendy, you have to
classified material is or isn t a crime. if it is they should be prosecuted. they would challenge it or constitutional grounds. they might or might not win. we can t allow the government to pick or choose. going back to your opening statement here today which you ll be surprised that i agree with much of. i want the government out of deciding what the churches can say. you don t want the government to say new york times, that s good. if it s a radical newspaper like so and so, maybe it s not. we don t want to give the government any discretion as to which media to go after. the law has to be changed to make it absolutely clear what that red line is and when you cross it [ applause ] i would think there is a huge difference between a paper publishing the existence of a program and publishing operational details, names of agents, locations that could actually endanger somebody s life. that would have to be factored in, would it not? that should be part of the law. believe it or not,
a crime. if it is they should be prosecuted. they would challenge it or constitutional grounds. they might or might not win. we can t allow the government to pick or choose. going back to your opening statement here today which you ll be surprised that i agree with much of. i want the government out of deciding what the churches can say. you don t want the government to say new york times, that s good. if it s a radical newspaper like so and so, maybe it s not. we don t want to give the government any discretion as to which media to go after. the law has to be changed to make it absolutely clear what that red line is and when you cross it [ applause ] i would think there is a huge difference between a paper publishing the existence of a program and publishing operational details, names of agents, locations that could actually endanger somebody s life. that would have to be factored in, would it not? that should be part of the law. believe it or not, it s not today part of the law a
classified material is or isn t a crime. if it is they should be prosecuted. they would challenge it or constitutional grounds. they might or might not win. we can t allow the government to pick or choose. going back to your opening statement here today which you ll be surprised that i agree with much of. i want the government out of deciding what the churches can say. you don t want the government to say new york times, that s good. if it s a radical newspaper like so and so, maybe it s not. we don t want to give the government any discretion as to which media to go after. the law has to be changed to make it absolutely clear what that red line is and when you cross it [ applause ] i would think there is a huge difference between a paper publishing the existence of a program and publishing operational details, names of agents, locations that could actually endanger somebody s life. that would have to be factored in, would it not? that should be part of the law. believe it or not,
the month of march. the smallest gain in nine months. and it s about half of what economists were predicting overall. the jobless rate fell to 7.6% because that s because a half million people gave up looking for work. that s all factored in. alison kosik at the new york stock exchange for me. what is spooking the companies on the hiring front? you know what it is, it s about the uncertainty of what s ahead, what s to come. we saw companies rein in their hiring plans because they aren t completely sure how the government spending cuts will impact the economy when they really get going. so this could be the beginning of a spring slump for the jobs market and the economy as a whole. ben bernanke cautioned this is a possibility especially since it often happens anyway at this time of year because you often see the temporary holiday jobs cleared off payrolls. but the reason we re roered about the report today is because while, why, we ve been