intervening action or debate. is there objection? reserving the right to object, we passed similar legislation during the government shutdown back in 2013. my hope is we can restore funding for the entire government before this becomes necessary. i m going to object for tonight, but we ll discuss again tomorrow. therefore, i object. objection is heard. senator from florida? let me give you a little context. claire mccaskill, democrat from missouri, considered one of the more vulnerable democrats coming up for election in 2018, did in fact vote she broke with the party and voted with republicans in favor of the continuing resolution. now, back in 2013 when the government shut down, the senate did vote to continue issuing checks to military members and the spouses of military members who had been killed. that is because while active members of the military will continue to be paid regardless
figure during that time period. steve bannon. is he right? i think there s a lot of merit in that argument because i think the women of america were extraordinarily offended and outraged by the statement and the alleged conduct or the conduct that he said he involved himself in. what kellyanne did, a woman came forward, an articulate woman and said, look, he really didn t mean that, that s not the kind of person he is, i know him, and she gave her imprimatur to donald trump, and we know an awful lot of women did in fact vote for donald trump, which i find very, very surprising given what he said and his conduct. so i think there s some merit in what bannon says on that issue, because i think kellyanne conway did, in fact, give him some greater credibility than he
u.n. call it a defense of american values. listen. friend need to tell each other the heart truths and friendships require mutual respect. i am compelled to respond today that the united states did in fact vote in accordance with our values, just as previous u.s. administrations have done at the security council before us. kennedy: let s bring it out to the couch.รง herman cain, you had a lot to say during the speech. yes. kennedy: a lot to say. it was a very long speech. yes. kennedy: he obviously had two objectives here, make the case to the american people and the world for the two-state solution for israel and also defend the u.s. in that abstention vote. did he succeed on either front? no. there is an old saying, when people don t agree with your conclusion, dazzle them with i can t say it on the air, rhetoric. that is what this was. the only thing worse than a one her plus speech by john kerry is
reasons we re talking about these things is because he s keeping them up there. wow. nbc news caught up with charlie after tuesday s general election and he did in fact vote for donald trump. while the economy drove his decision at the ballot box, there were plenty of other issues fueling his supporters from students to latinos to disaffected democrats and msnbc got to know many of them first hand. the donald. if it wasn t donald, it would be the bernie. people don t trust the establishment. they see big money and big banks and wall street funding and supporting these candidates. we need to do something about manufacturing jobs and get good paying jobs back in this country and get people back to work. the supreme court justices for the next election are going to be our children s lives. i don t like trump per se. i despise hillary even more than i despise him. make america great again. you think so? he s a person that speaks his mind. i m tired of the normal
them, get the rappers and celebrities out there it detracts from the messenger and donald trump was the best messenger. you can t take that away from him. this was always a change election. people missed something so often in front of them. you can t say 70 prgs of americans want to take the country in a new, different direction and yet they are not going to vote for the guy that represents a new, different direction. they did in fact vote for the guy. also i think in modelling the electorate, there were conclusions in search of evidence. i think politics today puts people in boxes too easily. political pundits put people in boxes too easily. they look at our gender, ethnicity, race, religion and we need to look at people situationally. if you were negatively affect bd i the obamacare premium increases you heard trump loud and clear in the second half of october talking about that religiously, every day. if you are somebody in a union household you look like a