neil: okay. this was different. the scene today on san francisco s bay bridge. pro palestinian protesters shutting down the bridge and some throwing their car keys in the water. more than 50 arrested. the bigger news coming from gaza in a deal that could be imminent on a the release of 50 hostages. coming up, we ll take to israel s minister on what he makes of this. welcome, everybody. i m neil cavuto. i want to go to jeff paul in southern israel with the very latest on all of this. jeff? yeah, neil, we re just learning the body of one of the people that was abducted by hamas back on october 7 has been just discovered by israel forces. the idf confirming that a 65-year-old was found in a structure near the shifa hospital. that is the location or close to the location where israeli forces for a second day are searching in an around the vast hospital complex. commands doughs are entering each of the hospital s buildings going floor to floor through the lens of the idf. we v
I wanted to confirm a Point Of Order is the rules of decorum. I dont believe the gentleman from florida meant to violate them and i give him the benefit of the doubt. More than once he referred to a new york lawyer. If he could explain what he meant i withdraw my Point Of Order. Thats not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order regarding the schedule. In this case, there is. Will you answer my question . The gentleman will suspend. There is no recognizable Point Of Order regarding the future schedule. Will you recognize that . No. Mrs. Mcbath is recognized. Thank you, mr. Chairman. I want to follow up on one part of President Trumps conduct. I asked our constitutional scholars about last week. The Investigative Committees found evidence President Trump
intimidated, threatened and tampered with prospective and actual witnesses in the Impeachment Inquiry, correct . Yes. It is a federal crime to intimidate or seek to i
and supposed to be the one constitutionally responsible. why won t he rst of all, if either of them had gone at the very start of the crisis no one would be asking why haven t you gone to the border. they would have done it. number two they would have gone a fact finding information on how to deal with the crisis. a national disaster. if you show up the day after the hurricane hits then you aren t responsible for the damage but you show up after a 90 days and it is still a disaster area maybe you are part of the problem. this is a manmade disaster. a direct result of joe biden reversing trump s successful policies at the border. he lifted the emergency declaration, put a moratorium on deportations, lifted the remain in mexico policy, lifted the country agreements and the president of guatemala says the day joe biden took office the coyotes started organizing children to come across the border. it is a direct result of the policies and why they don t
practice doing a fact-finding information is to keep the information closed. the reason is exactly what i described earlier with ambassador sondland, first of all, the day before his deposition he spoke with secretary perry about his testimony. that is the type of tailoring that can happen when people are engaged in misconduct and they try to line up their stories. if you keep the information closed they can t line up their stories. i think frankly part of the reason why ambassador volker and sondland s public hearing testimony was so different from their deposition testimony because the initial depositions were in closed session before we then released all the transcripts to the public. this is unprecedented because in the nixon and clinton impeachment hearings there were not closed depositions before the hearings. yes. it was passed by republican
the president himself. the other thing that came across to me loud and clear is that mueller has talked to people who were singing like canaries. people who copped a plea. flynn would be in that category. i think mueller has information that he would like to turn around and then question trump on. i personally think trump would be crazy to subject himself to an interrogation. it could be stunning, but you were nodding your head for the notion that michael flynn provided information. it s not going to be a fact-finding information when mueller interviews him. i don t think he expects the president to give him a totally honest account of anything of what happened. that s not who the president is. but i think he might have other information and he wants to see he knows the answer. that s exactly right. the purpose in some ways might be to trap the president into saying things that are untrue, but i think he has more information than he s seeking. a lot of people are looking to