they leave to the sound discretion of the trial judge. it s really up to him. he s the man on the ground looking at the evidence. so you see this act after act, where judges have found that trump has abuseed the legal process or that trump has lied. his lawyers are objecting saying these are facts that have nothing to do with this case and they couldn t come in and that s just not what this argument is about. because as adam has done a great job of laying out. the only thing the government could use these prior instances for, at least on cross- examination is to attack donald trump s credibility so that they can then argue to the jury, you shouldn t believe anything he told you on the stand. any defenses he said this man has lied in the past. and you should judge his credibility today in light of all these other times he s been less than truthful. that should be enough to keep him off the stand. but with trump, who knows. right. and joyce, as an attorney did
sound discretion of the trial judges. it s up to him. he is the man on the ground looking at the evidence so you see this act after act where judges have found that trump has abused the legal process or that trump has lied. his lawyers are objecting saying these are facts that have nothing to do with this case and they couldn t come in and that s just not what this argument is about because as adam has done a great job the only thing that s government could use these prior instances for at least on cross is to attack donald trump s credibility to argue you shouldn t believe anything he told you on the stand. he has lied in the past and you should judge his credibility light of all the other times he has been less than truthful. that should be enough to keep him soff the stand but with trump who knows. did we learn anything this
inside testimony, these are public statements, what we heard from mark meadows, what sydney powell was saying on tv. one of the things, and one of the arguments that falls flat often is when you hear republican illegal, quote unquote, scholars who may skew further to the right, as they say that it is very difficult to prove intent in these crimes. i say that might be one thing, but if you can couple that intent with an over act, then you have the elements of a criminal enterprise for criminal activity. he or she actually laid out, i don t know how many acts it is, but she actually laid out act after act after act, these over, outward things that donald trump and the other 18 or 19 nvidia visuals did. and so what i think fani did tonight was really comprehensive, and i want to take a moment to acknowledge who she is. whether or not it is april ryan or abby philip or, we have seen him snap at black women in
indictment was a district attorney s office that wanted to be very clear that they were offering a detailed accounting of why they felt this was a compelling racketeering case. we see act after act after act listed in this indictment as in furtherance of the conspiracy, some of which happened in georgia and some of which did not because they wanted to show that this is a wide net that trump and his allies cast in their efforts to try to overturn the election results and keep trump in power, jim. and using rico statutes, which are something that have often been used and by the way by rudy giuliani himself to target organized crime. the defendants have until august 25th, next friday, to surrender to turn themselves in. we should add the caveat that doesn t mean they re going to stay. they ll turn themselves in for that day and likely leave, perhaps under bond. can you explain what that will entail exactly, and has anyone shown up yet? reporter: well, we re not aware of anyone who s t
The ECB’s governing council decided to hike rate by a much anticipated 75 bps, citing problematic inflation. Reinvestment repurchases continue and TLTRO rates adjusted