San Francisco Police said they responded to a physical fight between several men on market between fourth and fifth streets at 5 09 tuesday evening. It happened in front of the timberland store and walgreens. One of them and had a nice. We know that the male suspect was brandishing a knife. As to the steps and the time frames of what occurred here, they are all under investigation. Reporter police said the man was struck by gunfire, but did not say how many officers fired their guns. They also say an officer fired a beanbag shotgun and a sheriffs deputy used a taser. Police are not saying in what order the weapons were deployed. The man was taken to San Francisco general hospital. We are reviewing cameras, eyewitness statements, as well as any Video Surveillance that caught the incident. Reporter a hospital spokesman tells me the man is in critical condition. San Francisco Police, the District Attorneys Office and the department of political ability are investigating this fully shootin
Because of course if the government were targeting a particular known u. S. Person for surveillance for criminal prosecution purposes it would need a warrant. Heres how that looks in practice. The government certifies to the fisa court would have no interest in any particular known u. S. Person, clicks the data, then run searches on the data using the names phone numbers and email accounts of particular note u. S. Persons. This is called backdoor searches. The nsa and the set a data privately to thousand of these in 2013. According to the privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board the fbi does these routinely. Routinely searches databases containing section seven to data when it investigates americans or even performs assessments which means no factual basis. Warrantless surveillance, warrantless foreign Intelligence Surveillance have absolute become a domestic Law Enforcement tool. I do give anything to add or if you youre seeing this is concerned youre seeing a similar cases as well
Perspective on whether or not account be searched to use for arrest. It goes through four examples of the difference. To paraphrase it quickly, a phone stores more pieces of data that reels more about a person. Text messages and emails and pictures and apps. And when you look at that it reveals more about a person. The second is if you only look at one piece of data on the phone there is so much about it it reveals more about a person. You may have a picture of a kid in your wallet but your cell phone will have pictures of what you ate for dinner and who you hang out with and whatnot. And that matters. The other two things the court emphasized is that the data goes back before the phone is purchased. You have ten years of emails all over again. And you know, the fourth point was that phones are so pervasive in Society Today and all these things together triggered a different constitutional analysis that was not dependent on what the court said 40 years ago. That approach can work in ot
Its going . Looking at the Court Decisions that have come down to date. And a corollary of that is does the current analysis under the Fourth Amendment, reasonable expectation of privacy, does it really fit this subject matter . Or is there another way to look at it, perhaps . Another topic is how do we find out in our cases whether this technology has been used . Youve heard from our last panel efforts that have been made by Law Enforcement to keep it secret. How do we determine that it has been used . And for instance, in the instance of the stingray device, even after it was discovered that it was being used, Law Enforcement made an effort to keep the details of how the device worked secret. How do you discover how these devices are used, whether, for instance, they involve a trespass that would evoke the plurality of opinion in jones, how are they attached to something . Do they grab something out of the air . How do they work . And third, what do we do with this stuff . How do we
Wisconsin completed its county campus of votes finding joe biden beat President Trump by 26,500 votes, the Trump Campaign considering whether to pay for a recount in the badger state. More votes found in the state of georgia and more u. S. Troops soon coming home from the middle east in asia. In williamsport, pennsylvania, Rudy Giuliani leading the Trump Campaign into courts trying to hold off a motion to dismiss the campaigns challenge to the vote in the keystone state. If the obama appointed judge grants the motion to dismiss, it could be a big blow to the Trump Campaign, but giuliani suggests a loss could be a stepping stone to the supreme court. Democrats insist it is well past time for President Trump to move on. The president lost the election. The recount in georgia and other places im sure will demonstrate that. In georgia, more good news for President Trump, another missing memory card, reducing joe bidens margin by another 449 votes, though biden still leads by 13,000 statewi