Transcripts for FOXNEWS FOX and Friends 20200313 10:53:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
case, this goes directly to that. whether there is a right of congress to seek information from the white house and the executive branch, particularly when there is an impeachment proceeding at stake, or anything else that s serious. and the white house position has been no, you don t got that. this decision today starts changing the balance here. well, david, you said why 74. i said maybe there was a particularly good dead show at the film noir. but that s just because i know. i ve been to one dead show my entire life, and it wasn t 1974. well, that s your mistake, your life mistake given the decades we ve lived through. we can argue that. but look, the other thing between the nixon 74, is there has been many comparisons across the country in washington and law and politics to the mueller hearings and now these very powerful impeachment hearings. but the big difference people kind knopf but is easy to forget and tonight puts such an explanation point on it is what
president trump moon. while there, if chairman kim of north korea sees this, i would meet him at the border, dmz, just to shake his hand and say hello, question mark, explanation point. joining me is aaron david miller, former state department negotiator and commentator. errol lewis, political commentator for spectrum news. errol, let me start with you. the president just asked to meet kim jong-un with the taushlness that i call my the casualness that i call my friends or text them and say hey, let s meet for tacos. is it plausible to think it is what it is on its face, that there is no kind of background work to see if there will be this meeting, or the president just tweeted out, hey, if you see this, meet me at the dmz? some of the reporting suggests that a secret and undidn t closed meeting to undisclosed meeting to the dmz
boring in all caps, explanation point. i want to test what you said here, the president sucks up all of the oxygen and seeps into every conceivable action. yesterday, he was attacking a u.s. woman s soccer player. given that, why was it not appropriate for the democrats to focus on themselves as we look at air force one here. they can chom to talk about whomever they want. what they will be called on to do and prove largely to democratic voters is prove that they are the best to take on donald trump at some point. there was not a contrast offered between these candidates and the current president of the united states for the most part.
to put the explanation point on the amount of money we re talking about, $100 million raised for an inauguration. that is an unprecedented figure. just to begin with. yes, well, i think it may be double or more of what barack obama raised. and there are these continuing questions about, okay, where did all of this money go? did people in the trump organization or the family make any money of this? and who paid where foreigners were paying. i think one note of caution, erin. tom barrick, who ran the inaugural committee, is in many circles one of the most respected people around donald trump. i know the president wanted him to come into the government, but it s just it s hard see him sitting over this some sort of piggy bank and being content in letting it go. that s not his personality, that s not his reputation. no, it isn t, and certainly he runs a publicly traded company. it wouldn t make any sense at all. but the reporting from axios relates to rick gates, his