trying to rinse a little bit of bannon out than the fact that they announced today that trump is going to davos. that is true. you re right, that is the explanation point. wouldn t that just make steve bannon s head explode? however, bannon would be the next guy to say yeah, i ll come and do a panel there. because he wants to be able to say he went into the belly of the beast. and he needs a place go now. i want to switch gears. chuck grassley and dianne feinstein are in a senate feud. it s clear she is angry about the christopher steele decision by lindsey graham and chuck grassley and then this released today. bill, we can have a debate about whose side are you on this, the fact of the matter is that they are not working together, it is the investigation that loses. yeah, and i think it gets to the thing we discussed before, trump and trumpism and reaction to trumpism is putting a lot of pressure on the institutions of
leave that thing at that. you know what i didn t hear? of course i m running for re-election. that s not the first time he said that, i m not going anywhere any time soon. sticking around another year doesn t mean he is running for reelection. the me the better question is not only will you end up being on the ballot in 2018, could you expect to be in congress and speaker in 2019. it seems this is my explanation point this is my policy win. i got tax reform in i m not going to do the entitlement reform that he dreamed of but he s out. that was an amazing non-answer answer. amazing non-answer answer. you have to think about the stress. the republicans who are sticking with trump and others who see themselves as true conservatives who are like what are we doing passing a tax bill that is going to be increasing the deficit.
coast. around the world. good day to you. a tweet from the u.s. president s personal account raises a stubborn and haunting question, what did the president know and when did he know it? the focus is on his fired national security adviser michael flynn. the tweet reads, i had to fire general flynn because he lied to the vice president and the fbi. he has pled guilty to those lies, it is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. there was nothing to hide, explanation point, from u.s. president donald trump. if true this tweet is explosive. it means mr. trump knew michael flynn had broken the law when he asked the then fbi director james comey in february to drop the investigation into flynn. here s what the president said saturday. what has been shown is no collusion, no collusion. there has been absolutely there has been absolutely no collusion. so we re very happy. and frankly, last night was one
an area of the campaign. i think it would be negligent for us not to get to the bottom of it. president obama s national security adviser susan rice met with your committee earlier today behind closed doors. what, if anything, can you tell us about that meeting? we don t usually go into the contents of our closed meetings. we allow the witnesses to discuss it if they wish. the most i can say is she was completely forthcoming with us, answered every question she had. i think everyone was satisfied with her testimony. the justice department revealed the other day that there is no evidence that president obama ordered the wiretapping of trump tower during the campaign, remember the allegation that was leveled by donald trump at the time. what do you make of that revelation coming out right now? to be the definitive explanation point after comey testified to that and rogers testified to that, and everyone
this is part of the russian game and it hasn t changed since the soviet union. disinformation, we now call it fake news, but the soviets were the originators of this kind of stuff. as we know, the russians are essentially a successor to the soviet union in idealogy. what s your take on that? jack is absolutely right. let s explore your point. if you have russians who know that they re on an insecure level of communications and they reveal highly confidential information, you have to assume that they want you to know that. and the question is, why do they want you to know it? why would they want jared kushner to know that? maybe as a form of leverage for something they have that s even more in depth? the point is jared kushner s request to use russian secure cryp cryptographic systems that s run