Until we have that Comfort Level up. When you say polling are you talking about an actual poll to survey by phone . Yes. The phone survey of customers. Its refreshing of the same survey, same type of survey we connected earlier on in the program to make sure we still have good data to base our expectations of customer opt out and acceptance of the program offering. Is that something you can share next time we meet . Yeah, we should be in a position to share the questions. I think were going to preview the approach with you informally. I dont know if that preview can happen in the public setting given i dont think we want to wait for that until we launch it. I think it would be great to share with you as members of lafco. Yeah, sounds great. [inaudible] i can wait. Thank you. So we did have as i said our Commission Meeting on tuesday did address the cleanpower sf. We did get a presentation from local power, our consultants that are advisingous how to structure the program to accelerate
10 of a very big number so we need to have a more aggressive approach i think. Its important to do that but we need a more aggressive approach. That wont quite hit it. And the other thing i wanted to mention is that the work that local power has done is first of all its preliminary and secondly its really a framework for talking through all the issues and its fairly complex as everyone who has encountered it has recognized and there are a lot of assumptions made that have a lot of implications in the way things turn out but its a framework where we held the discussion and pull out the issues of different approaches, different scenarios and what not, and thats been a fruitful discussion to have, and we would like lafco to urge that that kind of discussion continue to sort of pull out of those deliverables the types of information and analysis thats richly embedded there as opposed to start thinking automatically of alternative approaches which initially dont seem to be as comprehensive
Saw in the last week is that because of some of the critiques of that model we have been working on for a couple of years the staff has proposed going to a completely different model that is building large solar farms at a distance in front of the meter so they have go through pg e transmission and distribution lines and these would be sold the more expensive way to do renewables and all of this is going to roughly double the cost of the rate on energy to the customer, so its vital that we get the lafco to send a strong message to the sfpuc hey thats not good enough. We need the local distribution and the local jobs. We need to get back to the other model and make it work. Thanks. Thank you. Any other member of the public would like to comment please come forward. David mc cord. I am the chair of the Energy Committee and San Francisco has a great opportunity here now to develop really first Class Community choice aggregation system and right now there are two models presented. One by p
Opted in and not opt out, and as mr. Brooks said lots of jobs for San Francisco residents, so i would like the commission to send a strong message that for puc staff to work with the local power to develop the best cca that is possible. Thank you. Thank you very much. And next speaker please. Good afternoon folks. Alwine from the Clean Energy Alliance and i have the great opportunity to be chairing those stakeholder meetings that take place, fairly contentious of recent time. I wanted to address two questions quickly. One is a question of the rates and the high rates that i think everybody concerned about it at roll out time which according to the proposals that have been put before the rate fairness board are roughly somewhere depending on your tier between 18 and 30 above current bills, and its really important that we feel, the advocates, and the commission itself feels to really lower those rates and i wanted to say we encourage every effort to do that. That the proposal youre putt
Puc staff to work with the local power to develop the best cca that is possible. Thank you. Thank you very much. And next speaker please. Good afternoon folks. Alwine from the Clean Energy Alliance and i have the great opportunity to be chairing those stakeholder meetings that take place, fairly contentious of recent time. I wanted to address two questions quickly. One is a question of the rates and the high rates that i think everybody concerned about it at roll out time which according to the proposals that have been put before the rate fairness board are roughly somewhere depending on your tier between 18 and 30 above current bills, and its really important that we feel, the advocates, and the commission itself feels to really lower those rates and i wanted to say we encourage every effort to do that. That the proposal youre putting forward supervisor campos would not make a huge difference in those rates. I mean looking at the numbers is that the rate recovery is roughly in the ord