In the ways memorializing Founding Fathers difference from differs from confederates. President lincolns cottage in washington, d. C. , provided the video. Tonight is not unique in that we will be focusing on preconceptions on memorials, but it is unique in that it is not just a conversation in response to recent events, both the killing of unarmed black citizens by mostly White Police Officers or ex Police Officer as well as the protests across the country and around the world, which have called for both systemic change and a reckoning for the symbols, monuments, memorials and flags of white supremacy. Many of which relate to the civil war era. What makes our conversation tonight also different is that weve already had it. Five years ago, in fact. I want you to all think back to think about where you were in the summer of 2015, vergne and edna you gave us your time back then and you spoke in the rake of the Confederate Flag being taken down following the murder of nine parishioners at
Is what we do believe that if youre a genius or not if you dont. Give us big. Sign it just. Says on those im going to join it is only. Just trust me as it examines this your knesset exam i was the 1st going is unfair see it up chris said dont fix it its all there are. To attract Foreign Investors youre the problem is canada did would integrate the International Arbitration system called dns into the treaty. The cornerstone of the system is the deterrent effect for states when a complaint is made. When a state nationalized is a business. It seizes property and the state then compensates for this expropriation. But if the state raises the minimum wage or passes an engine. Or prohibits disruptors it can affect a companys gains. This is an indirect expose creation since its a loss of earnings. Sufficient ground for suing a state before a private International Arbitration tribunals. On our demands for press. To dictate that our demand is on the move before. Our. Numbers to smoking are. A re
Talk but it is unique in that this is not just a conversation response to recent events, both the killing of unarmed black citizens by mostly White Police Officers or expolice officers, as well as the protests across the country and around the world that have called for systemic change and a reckoning for the monuments memorials and flakes of White Supremacy, many of which relate to the war era what makes our conversation different is we have already had a. Five years ago. I want you to think back to where you were in the some of 2015. Us yournd edna you gave time back then and you spoke in the wake of a flutter at flag intake down at the stake at house a Confederate Flag being taken down at a steakhouse in north carolina. At a state house in north carolina. One of the things you said in 2015 was that you were encouraged by the change in the flag coming down etc. , but you i i think this movement but i am afraid it is not parliament not permanent. Im afraid people thought it was the ri
Well big. Its good if. We did that if youd seen us or not if you dont. Give us big. Sign it just. Says on those im going to join it is only. Just sit exam this your knesset exam i was the 1st going is unfair see it up chris said dont fix it its on the arab. Street. Track to Foreign Investors promise canada that it would integrate the International Arbitration system called dns into the treaty. The cornerstone of the system is the deterred. Fact 4 states when a complaint is made. Women state nationalized is a business it sees as property and the state then compensates for this expropriation. But if the state raises the minimum wage passes and. Or prohibits destructors it can affect a companys gains. This is an indirect expose creation since its a loss of earnings. Sufficient ground for suing a state before a private International Arbitration tribunals. On our demands for press. To dictate that our demand is on the move before. Our. Numbers to smoking are. A real scandal. This interactiv
Historian kate color gives American History tv guided tour of an exhibit marking the centennial of the 19th advancement. Using images of early suffrage leaders, she shows how the movement intersected with the abolitionist and temperance movements. This is the first of a two part program. Hi everyone, welcome to the National Portrait gallery at the Smithsonian Institution im the curator of votes for women. For this exhibition i worked 3. 5 years researching, finding all the objects. We have about 124 objects, 63 portraits. I was hoping to commemorate the 19th amendment and tell the history of the 19th amendment and how women lobbied to get this amendment passed and ratified. But also ask questions about it. Ask what does it do and what does it not to. And why 1965, the Voting Rights act, was considered a part two of the voting amendment. I will show you a few of the objects that tell this history. We are in the first gallery of the exhibition. I mentioned we have portraits that drive th