responds seems to be we don t have the power to do these things. effectively they are kind of employed just to persuade mps to go and vote on the right way, they re not ministers and departments. they are not official is dispersing money. that is the reality of situation. until someone can provide evidence that funding stops for something following a vote you don t really have a case, do you? weill. really have a case, do you? well, there were really have a case, do you? well, there were two really have a case, do you? well, there were two discrete really have a case, do you? well, there were two discrete issues i really have a case, do you? ii there were two discrete issues here. there is an issue about over vigorous whipping and that issue about over vigorous whipping does have very important constitutional implications in our constitution parliament is supreme and whipping really is about transferring the power of parliament into the hands of ministers, into the hands of the e
think that it is some excess of the executors, some crazy soldiers on the ground to doing this, but at the same time you are reading the ex-president just today published in his social network the statements about eradicating ukrainians that all ukrainians should be published, and you understand that is a state policy. that s not anymore just one mr. putin or some stupid soldier on the ground. when you understand that is state policy, understand that you need to act in the international courts with the criminal cases against individuals with the forces and ukraine needs to fight back because now we understand that we don t want the second bucha, irpin or any other towns and honestly the picture you are showing that is the softest from what i saw within the last few days from my friends among the human rights who are documenting
the eighth at tempe. we don t really believe them any more. we don t think they really understand which area is going to be back when because we also know from having spoken to various members of the council and the fire brigade and engineers, entire sections of the power line are having to be rebuilt and in some circumstances this could take a long time. telling people it will be fixed every few days makes it very difficult for people to plan and it makes it very difficult for people to think i m going to cut my losses and stay with relatives were a couple of weeks, we will get the kids somewhere warm and then just monitor things. kids somewhere warm and then just monitorthings. if kids somewhere warm and then just monitor things. if people say it will be changing in a few days time we think, we will tough it out. so this is a problem. it is frustrating when we see executors of the company going on to broadcast media to update people executives. the people who need to be updated ar
the dobbs case. which asked that question. so that will be coming before the court this fall. so the dobbs case in mississippi is about a 15-week benchmark. the texas law is a six-week benchmark and then this civil authority for people to sue, basically they become the executors of law. which one do you think is a bigger problem? they re both an enormous problem. they re both clear violations of the constitution. as the department of justice s lawsuit made clear today, there has been an unbroken line of supreme court cases that have said that previability, the government cannot take the decision away from a person about ending a pregnancy. so that unbroken line of cases goes back 48 years now, and the precedent is very strong. there is only one justice breyer said it. what the court did last week was very, very, very wrong in