Xử lý nghiêm hành vi chống người thi hành công vụ
Xử lý nghiêm hành vi chống người thi hành công vụ
Thời gian gần đây, địa bàn thành phố xảy ra một số vụ chống người thi hành công vụ liên quan dịch COVID-19. Trong khi các cấp chính quyền, ngành chức năng và người dân đang nỗ lực khắc phục khó khăn để đẩy lùi dịch bệnh thì hành vi của các đối tượng đi ngược lại với các quy định về phòng, chống dịch. Xử lý nghiêm các đối tượng này là việc làm cần thiết để giữ gìn kỷ cương, pháp luật và tạo tính răn đe, phòng ngừa trong cộng đồng.
please don t accept an alternate reality that would have us believe in things that are obviously not true. in the service of executive behavior that we never would have encouraged and a theory of executive power that we have always found abhorrent. if there ever was a time to put country over party, it is now, and by putting country over party, you might just save the grand old party before it s too late. with us two members of the grand old party, scott jennings is a former special assistant to president george w. bush, and charlie dent is a former congressman from pennsylvania. scott, you have long defended this president. how do flake s words hit you? well, look, i respect everybody s right to have an opinion. that s certainly not the opinion of most republicans. the president enjoys an approval rating over 90% from rank and file republicans out here in middle america because he is largely doing what he promised them he was going to do, and that s break up the old
it s about what happens in the future. we re not relitigating 2016. this is not undoing the election. this is about looking at 2020 and beyond, and the proper role, the proper balance between executive authority, executive behavior, veoversight by the congress, et cetera.t let me ask you about the other big headline we started with today. if barr is so confident in his supreme power, why do all this stuff? i mean, you and i worked with republicans, and the ones who really don t care about the press don t do national interviews and complain about the press. the ones who really believe the durham investigation is going their way, don t force a statement out of durham, the person running the investigation. the ones who really think the president doesn t have any worries about gop support in the senate don t do what they did in the last 24or hours which is tw written statements from the justice department, one in my personal opinion seemingly coerced written statement from mr. durham. an
through his entire career-ending decision to come forward with this, he thinks it s got a timeliness factor to it. it s got a national security and/or criminal factor to it. and if we don t get to it soon, we have further national security interests. and we re left really for people to take matters into their own hands, meaning the institutions are failing us and the only thing left is the people s vote come the next election. harry litman, why was attorney general barr consulted and with the way he s conducted himself in that job, what concerns arise from that wrinkle to this story? yeah. i ve never heard of it before. and he has been an olc and steve engel have been in general the apologists and constructors of sort of far-fetched arguments on behalf of really aggressive and even stonewalling executive behavior. so it s not at all contemplated in the statute. the statute again totally clear. the inspector general makes a
about the dramatic effects of hydrocarbons, i go back to my earlier point. the 1,200 coal plants that are going up around the world. and so there is a hypocrisy here, neil, that i think deserves a national discussion. if you re going about a situation saying we re all in on it. then the people who aren t quite buying what you re saying aren t invited to discuss, maybe you re a little out on it, that is not very fair. that is not very balanced. let me say real quick, john. let me say this about executive behavior. executives must, if they re going to be successful, listen to all parties. they have to understand disparate views. i couldn t have succeeded if i didn t listen to people who were differing in opinion from me. and who evaluate the differences in opinion. what you don t want surrounding you are a bunch of people saying what you want them to say so that you can