Palo Alto Networks research find Australians blame executives more than tech workers when their organisation is attacked. 92% of Australians want.
Marie-France Fortin (University of Ottawa) has posted Rule of Law, Parliamentary Sovereignty and Executive Accountability in English Legal Thinking: The Recent Revival of The King Can Do No Wrong (Journal of Constitutional History, Forthcoming, Autumn 2022) on SSRN. Here is.
Statements on the Future of Banking in Ireland - Opening Speech by Minister Donohoe
Check Against Delivery
Ceann Comhairle, thank you for the opportunity to discuss this very important topic. I am sharing time with the Minister of State, Deputy Fleming.
We are living in uncertain times, and this assessment is particularly applicable to the banking sector. It has been a difficult year with all of the challenges that the pandemic has brought and the number of market announcements already this year.
As Deputies will recall we discussed the issue of banking at length in March. In May I was also invited to address the Seanad and hear the views of Senators on the future of banking.
Parliamentary committees work as watch-dogs, ensure executive accountability: RS Deputy Chairman ANI | Updated: Mar 14, 2021 21:52 IST
New Delhi [India], March 14 (ANI): Parliamentary committees work as watch-dog and as an instrument of ensuring executive accountability, said Deputy Rajya Sabha Chairperson Harivansh on Sunday. Parliamentary committees work as watch-dogs and instruments of ensuring the executive s accountability. Committees work in non-partisan manners where Members express their opinions freely, objectively and independently and the decision of the committees are based on broad consensus, a statement from the upper house quoted Harivansh as saying while addressing newly-elected Members of Parliament of the Rajya Sabha at a two-day Orientation Program.
provisions that were allowed to expire in 1999. yesterday democrat chuck schumer took to the floor, criticizing the nominee for those comments. considering everything we know about judge kavanaugh s expansive view of executive power and accountability, the fact that morrison v. olsen, of all of the cases in the history of the supreme court, was the first case he could think of overturning is deeply, teamly troubling. we already know he believes a president shouldn t be investigated while in office. that a president can t be indicted while in office, that a present doesn t have to follow law that the president deems his words unconstitutional. clearly judge kavanaugh s judicial philosophy incorporates an almost menarchal view of executive accountability, animated by a belief our chief executive gets to play by a