meritocracy approve of this decisiony ap. a few d just a few days ago, cbs newss ran a poll asking americans about this very issue. ver70% responded that colleges should not be allowed to use race in college admissions. a new york times poll recentlyam found 60% of democrats also oppose race as a factor in admissions. americans across the country have rejected affirmative action at the ballot box, too, evenat the b in blue state calia in the 2020 election. democratic leaders in the state put affirmative action on the ballot. the pre action oo affirmative an activists, the governor, both supp senators, even the golden state warriors, pushed voters to support the initiativthey oe they outspent opponents of oppon affirmative action by 19 to 1. and in the end, nearly 60% of californians voted to kill affirmative action. . it didn t work. no matter how hard the democratic party matte trieo matter how much money spen wpin, the american people have rejected the view that we should b
he emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwise they
The whistleblower made falseht statements, the whistleblower got caught with chairman schiff. Remember chairman schiff, the person that the democrats instead of the House Judicial Committee which has spent a full week on this, thats not who has been in charge. They put in charge was the person that got caught with the whistleblower. Have you spoken directly with the whistleblower . No, we have not. Wed like to. That wasnt true. The person that said he had evidence of the first fake impeachment scam, collusion with russia, had evidence of that collusion and didnt have it. The person who in the course of that read into the record the steele dossier because the people needed to know what happened about the truth of what happened. We heard about the truth of what happened with the steele dossier this week when the Inspector General said it was all garbage, rubbish, all made up. Yeah, thatad chairman schiff. And now he got caught not being truthful about a whistleblower who, as i told you t
but i think this is un-american. canceling fireworks. this is it s i ll prove itou. to you. it s in the national anthem . the rockets red glare, bombs bursting in air, gave proof through the nigh bombst that oug was still there. it says it in the national anthem. it clears in the morning. there s clear skies. the next daytherar. all right. and then if there s stuff in the wall, i ve never heard anybody puthwater.t it that way. yeah. what do you think? it works for me, though. that s what he was saying. he was saying. go ahead, have your fireworks in the morning. the skiet is wha sayins will be and then if there s anything in the water, you get the volunteers down. the boy scouts, go clean out the water. you know what i mean? scoop it out and you have a funk day of that as well. so, abby, it doesn t looke like they re getting anythey ain support for this, though. i don t think it s because with a federale actu lawsuit that the judge actually struck down and said there s no
the fact is, this indictment is the best they ve got. the facts that were outlined in the indictment, the bestoutlined they ve got. and i m not that impressed. there is n notessed.o evidence t the president was engaged in an attempt to profit personally fromt to pro these documents orc national security secrets to foreign entitie securits or n that he misplaced any of the documents. howeved anof ther, with joe bide are increasingly credible allegations that he and hisfamiy family did personally profit from his position in governmen t as vice president and president and to the tune and aps of millions and millions of dollars. the sad truthf dollar our mes apparently does not believe there ar believee any real natil security implications for the family of a sitting president or vice president to be setting up shell companiepslu that will funnel foreign money back to the family coffers, presumably in exchange for influence while so they do it. now, think about how this worksw . let s ju