he emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwise they
the fact is, this indictment is the best they ve got. the facts that were outlined in the indictment, the bestoutlined they ve got. and i m not that impressed. there is n notessed.o evidence t the president was engaged in an attempt to profit personally fromt to pro these documents orc national security secrets to foreign entitie securits or n that he misplaced any of the documents. howeved anof ther, with joe bide are increasingly credible allegations that he and hisfamiy family did personally profit from his position in governmen t as vice president and president and to the tune and aps of millions and millions of dollars. the sad truthf dollar our mes apparently does not believe there ar believee any real natil security implications for the family of a sitting president or vice president to be setting up shell companiepslu that will funnel foreign money back to the family coffers, presumably in exchange for influence while so they do it. now, think about how this worksw . let s ju