i don t know. i recall the second to last polygraph is when i was a supervisor at the washington field office that occurred in 2008 and 2011. my understanding what out of scope means to the fbi is that polygraphs have a five-year span of effectiveness or validity. we had several people we were trying to include getting read into a particular intelligence compartment. they ran the names. me and others were out of scope which happens because polygraphs are the line for polygraphs i understand. i m in the military. i understand the line and i understand the delays. you had a very secure job and one that is highly sensitive. so the question is i would assume to answer your evasiveness, you don t know how long you were out of scope. yes or no. i was trying to create so yes or no. i do not. what steps were taken to
i recall the penultimate, the second to last polygraph i had was i was washington field office. 2008, 2011. by out of scope, polygraphs have a five-year span of effectiveness or validity. we had several people we were trying to including me we were trying to get red into an intelligence department. they read some names, me and others were out of scope which happens because polygraphs were the line for polygraph i understand. i m in the military, mr. strzok. i understand the delays in them. you have a secure job and one that is highly sensitive. so, the question is again, i would assume to answer your evasiveness, you did not know how long you were out of scope, is that correct, yes or no? that s fair, sir. i was trying to recreate by recollection. do you know how long you were out of scope?
miracle of tv we couldn t turn around even quite fast enough, i just talked to richard blumenthal who was in the room for that donald trump jr. interview which he thought was a little bit of evasiveness, that maybe some of those i don t noes were not forthright. that there may be some questions that need to be answered about the lead-up to this meeting and whether junior talked to senior about the contents of that meet pgtd those will be questions that still have to be answered. one of the thing i ve been re reading in on on this is the jared kushner piece of this. he did speak with a couple other committees here but not the jaw dish airy committee. what stuck out in his statement, he says he was the person detailed during the campaign and the transition to keep up with foreign governments. right. reporter: and then he spoke to maybe 15 foreign governments during the process of this. almost all of those interactions had been laid out previously. but what stuck with me is that kushn
i don t recall. i don t recall. i don t recall. in your testimony today, you have stated i don t recall at least 20 times, is that fair to say? i have no idea. do you still believe that the intentional failure to remember can constitute a criminal act? if it s an act to deceive, yes. democratic congressman hakeem jeffries questioning attorney general jeff sessions about his recollection of contacts between members of the trump campaign team and russia. joining me now is another member of the house judiciary committee, democratic congressman steve cohen of tennessee. he also sits on the ethics committee. welcome back to the broadcast. i appreciate your time. i m going to get right to it. did the testimony from a.g. sessions, did it move the ball forward when it comes to answering questions about the trump campaign s contacts with russia? i think his evasiveness told us that there s much more to the russian contacts with the campaign than people suspected. i think they have b
deductible. senate republicans issued a statement saying the bill is nothing more than a political statement and a political gift card to planned parenthood that brought unnecessary drama and evasiveness to the end of the legislative session. the villanelle bill now goes te democratic governor who is expected to sign it. the bill costs $10 million, some of that will cover abortions for those who have insurance through providence health services. there is a religious exemption for insurance companies and providence is a major player, covering 250,000 residents. now taxpayers will pick up the tab for any of those abortions. oregon has the most liberal abortion laws in the u.s., no restrictions or waiting periods. california is the only other state to require insurance companies to cover the full cost