conferences. candidates go weeks and months without holding them. she s got sooner or later you re going to have to deal with these questions. i don t think that this is going to disappear anytime soon because it s just too much still there to be asked about. the committee s going to be on it. sooner or later she s going to have to deal with these things better than she did today. she may be able to stone wall her way through the democratic primary, possibly. but my sense about that is that might even become difficult if a serious challenger arrives. how big a factor is it that many of the pundits reinforce beliefs about the clintons and their apparent beliefs that they don t have to follow the same rules that everybody else does? well i think it awakens a lot of unpleasant memories about the clintons. the evasiveness of it the carefully lawyered answers, the technicalities she seemed to be relying on to say she was innocent of everything. you know, it s not going to stand, megyn
conferences. candidates go weeks and months without holding them. she s got sooner or later you re going to have to deal with these questions. i don t think that this is going to disappear anytime soon because it s just too much still there to be asked about. the committee s going to be on it. sooner or later she s going to have to deal with these things better than she did today. she may be able to stone wall her way through the democratic primary, possibly. but my sense about that is that might even become difficult if a serious challenger arrives. how big a factor is it that many of the pundits reinforce beliefs about the clintons and their apparent beliefs that they don t have to follow the same rules that everybody else does? well i think it awakens a lot of unpleasant memories about the clintons. the evasiveness of it the carefully lawyered answers, the technicalities she seemed to be relying on to say she was innocent of everything. you know, it s not going to stand, megyn
conferences. candidates go weeks and months without holding them. she s got sooner or later you re going to have to deal with these questions. i don t think that this is going to disappear anytime soon because it s just too much still there to be asked about. the committee s going to be on it. sooner or later she s going to have to deal with these things better than she did today. she may be able to stone wall her way through the democratic primary, possibly. but my sense about that is that might even become difficult if a serious challenger arrives. how big a factor is it that many of the pundits reinforce beliefs about the clintons and their apparent beliefs that they don t have to follow the same rules that everybody else does? well i think it awakens a lot of unpleasant memories about the clintons. the evasiveness of it the carefully lawyered answers, the technicalities she seemed to be relying on to say she was innocent of everything. you know, it s not going to stand, megyn
have have gotten away and benghazi did they not? it was the same thing. they re made up of fabricated strategy. and this what do you think? i don t buy it one bit. the answers about as straight as lombard street, a combination of evasiveness and competence make her as credible as a nigerian e-mail. when she tells the truth, it s almost entirely by accident. when you re watching her spin, it s like watching clothes in a dryer. you get nauseous. i think this is the strategy. it s a brilliant strategy. it confused everyone by the incompetence. you can t keep up. you can focus on one clown, baugh focus on a three-ring but you can t focus on a three-ring circus. she s incompetent. this is the most incompetent group of people you keep saying lie. they re not mutually exclusive things, though. they can be both. the story was here that he could she not know, bob? how could you not know? go on google. that s my point. if anyone needs to be careful, it should be her.
have have gotten away and benghazi did they not? it was the same thing. they re made up of fabricated strategy. and this what do you think? i don t buy it one bit. the answers about as straight as lombard street, a combination of evasiveness and competence make her as credible as a nigerian e-mail. when she tells the truth, it s almost entirely by accident. when you re watching her spin, it s like watching clothes in a dryer. you get nauseous. i think this is the strategy. it s a brilliant strategy. it confused everyone by the incompetence. you can t keep up. you can focus on one clown, baugh focus on a three-ring but you can t focus on a three-ring circus. she s incompetent. this is the most incompetent group of people you keep saying lie. they re not mutually exclusive things, though. they can be both. the story was here that he could she not know, bob? how could you not know? go on google. that s my point. if anyone needs to be