Would be subject to the special tax on the same basis of private property within the cft and that it affirmatively waives any dissent based on the fact of Public Ownership to any action to foreclose on the property in the event of nonpayment of the special tax. This to acknowledge recent statements that weve gotten from some of our public agencies including california tran and i have one more amendment on the item resolution calling for the special election. City county [inaudible] facility district. This is just an amendment on page 2, line 21. It merely states the date of the election. Further resolves this board of supervisors hereby calls a special election to consider the measure described above which election shall be held hereby calls a special election to consider the measure described above which election shall be held on december 29, 2014. I just want to reiterate that while we were very wary of the number of continuances in impacting the date of election and our ability to f
Question im glad supervisor wiener spoke line of questioning is clarified that theres consequences in this. Im just curious, and i dont know how much we can divulge on this, but what happened but it fell apart . Can you clarify . I guess rather than mean any specific names, i think that the issue is that the compromise were the new payment plan as a preferred to call it requires from the beginning that all 6 developers were agreeable. Otherwise if we dont get promises not to sue from all 6 its pointless because of one sues its the same as as if they all sued. So, we werent able to get that. There were 2 or 3 that were on board from the beginning and a couple that we couldnt get in the end. We thought we had assurances. We do have assurances in the beginning but minds change or something changed. So thats pretty much what happened. By late last week and began became clear we were not going to get the agreement from all the. Again, avoiding any names, there were several that were on boar
Items 2224 enhancer board. Supervisor can thank you. I will be the technical amendment rainout make a motion to adopt them. Again, theyre merely technical in nature. The one is on the 1st item the resolution to form this Community Facilities district on page 3. Lines 79 really just reflect that we had a continuance of this public hearing and whereas the board of supervisors opened a public hearing on september 2, 2014 and continued set public hearings to contact the night and whereas the board of supervisors continued a public hearing on september 9, 2014 and further continued the public hearing to september 23 4014 2014 and am finally on page 6 further resolved board of supervisors hereby acknowledges receipt and accept the terms of a statement from each of the 3 public agencies in accordance to government code 53111 in which he states that all or a portion of its land is intended to be transferred to private ownership that this would be subject to the special tax on the same basis of
Everybody knew that it was 8 a transport center. Diehl and it was very nice and generous and now theres somebody that wants to put a lawsuit together to stop it. Kind of like a almost a hostage situation. So, what they are after is the city and the people San Francisco losing a little bit of money. Or a lot of bit of money. The developer plans to keep a little bit more money. So im thinking why dont we put a little bit of our lawsuit together and lean, put a lien on all their properties and all of the officers, chairman of the board of directors, and put a lien on the personal properties that they own and just leave it like that for a while and see because theyre going to make money from our losing money. Its kind of an interesting idea. Thank you any of the members of the public was to speak on this topic . Okay see that at this time his hearing has been heard and is now filed. Colleagues items 2224 enhancer board. Supervisor can thank you. I will be the technical amendment rainout ma
Did we have here . I think everybody knew that it was 8 a transport center. Diehl and it was very nice and generous and now theres somebody that wants to put a lawsuit together to stop it. Kind of like a almost a hostage situation. So, what they are after is the city and the people San Francisco losing a little bit of money. Or a lot of bit of money. The developer plans to keep a little bit more money. So im thinking why dont we put a little bit of our lawsuit together and lean, put a lien on all their properties and all of the officers, chairman of the board of directors, and put a lien on the personal properties that they own and just leave it like that for a while and see because theyre going to make money from our losing money. Its kind of an interesting idea. Thank you any of the members of the public was to speak on this topic . Okay see that at this time his hearing has been heard and is now filed. Colleagues items 2224 enhancer board. Supervisor can thank you. I will be the tec