The last election and threatening, planning to spend 400 million in the next election in the midterms, that is a huge footprint and theres a lot more going on behind it. The second piece of that is bringing home the longterm effort of the Republican Party to put business friendly judges in the courts so that the courts are increasingly hostile to regular folks, and increasingly interested in protecting corporations. Watch afterwards sunday night at 9 00 eastern on cspan2s booktv. A panel examines the spread of populism in certain regions of the world including the us, europe and latin america including van smith and the origins of populism and contributing factors in the 2016 president ial election. This is about 90 minutes. We will start. Is everyone prepared . I want to thank everyone for coming, this kicks off our afternoon session. I will explain what we did in the morning and afternoon session which is a public discussion, debate about populism, entitled the rise of populism, a gl
The last election and threatening, planning to spend 400 million in the next election in the midterms, that is a huge footprint and theres a lot more going on behind it. The second piece of that is bringing home the longterm effort of the Republican Party to put business friendly judges in the courts so that the courts are increasingly hostile to regular folks, and increasingly interested in protecting corporations. Watch afterwards sunday night at 9 00 eastern on cspan2s booktv. A panel examines the spread of populism in certain regions of the world including the us, europe and latin america including van smith and the origins of populism and contributing factors in the 2016 president ial election. This is about 90 minutes. We will start. Is everyone prepared . I want to thank everyone for coming, this kicks off our afternoon session. I will explain what we did in the morning and afternoon session which is a public discussion, debate about populism, entitled the rise of populism, a gl
The last election and threatening, planning to spend 400 million in the next election in the midterms, that is a huge footprint and theres a lot more going on behind it. The second piece of that is bringing home the longterm effort of the Republican Party to put business friendly judges in the courts so that the courts are increasingly hostile to regular folks, and increasingly interested in protecting corporations. Watch afterwards sunday night at 9 00 eastern on cspan2s booktv. A panel examines the spread of populism in certain regions of the world including the us, europe and latin america including van smith and the origins of populism and contributing factors in the 2016 president ial election. This is about 90 minutes. We will start. Is everyone prepared . I want to thank everyone for coming, this kicks off our afternoon session. I will explain what we did in the morning and afternoon session which is a public discussion, debate about populism, entitled the rise of populism, a gl
His medicaid sustainable or does it need major changes . Guest how many hours you have on that one . Popular a great, Popular Program that isnt going anywhere. The question is whether it expands or what stays. The 25 of americans are in Medicaid Program. Its a huge program in the issue is will it get a lot bigger or stay the same size . Obviously its very politically controversial, a huge piece of the health care restructure of every state. It is a legitimate, massive policy debate thats a big piece of the budget debate, the secondbiggest program and federal government. A 600 billion a year program. It has grown massively in the last 15 years. I first got involved in 1989, the program is 50 billion a year now at 600 billion a year. When i was at cms in 2001, it was 200 billion a year. It is a massive program with a lot of structural complications which should be fixed. It is also a huge piece of Health Care Infrastructure and critical for a lot of americans and a legitimate Public Poli
Problem moving forward. Thank you so much for joining us today. Guest thanks for having me. Usingso how are americans experts in 2017 and how do they view them . Well, americans have always been skeptical of experts, that is part of our goes back toacter, the 1830s. Our commonrselves on sense. What is different in the 21st we question t that experts, its that we reject experts, reject their expertise our own knowledge in place. I think that is already angerous, whether a doctor or diplomat, people have decided they are smarter than the dont need them. Host is that a result of americans having more Information Available to them . What is leading to this shift in experts . Guest several factors, i turned this into a book called death expertise, available from oxford out of this piece. University e modern system, which encourages students to believe they are retty smart by the time they get to school, the media, which segmented into echo chambers people they are already hearing the things