As close as they can in real time. We do that by arranging the energy with the grid operator. The idea of firming and shape sg you produce a specific amountf Renewable Energy and that energy is delivered into the grid but you can using all the resources in the grid shape it . Into a profile that supports your consumers demand. The same amount of Renewable Energy is produced from that product as from the product content in category one product and the product conitant cat tent 3. Renewable yeents are merely documentation that a given amount of Renewable Energy is generated and delivered to the grid. Okay. So, then just going back to my question, for category 3 that is the only category where potentially we would go outside of the state unless it is on the boarder and delivered within california but that is the category where potentially we could purchase Renewable Energy credits . The category 3 are sort of the most liquid, they are the most easily traded. It doesnt have to be a out of state resource though. Bucket 3 category 3 recks are also produced in california. The idea is that when you buy a Renewable Energy credit you bought it separate from the underlying electricity. When i described category 1, by definition you have to buy the Renewable Energy credit with the lickticity. Product 3, that energy can be sold to a 3rd party and acquire the underlying wenewable Energy Credit attribute. It is a way to address the varability of renewable and originally intended to spur the market for Renewable Energy. In whati know we cant anticipate the future but in what situations would we want to utilize category 3 . Um, for Community Choice aggregation program, we are approaching resources today with a focus just on product content category 1 resources. Product conitant category 3 is really sort of a resource that would allows us to fill gaps. I think mr. Freed referred to emergency situations where we may a contract with a particular resource that for some reason goes off line but we were expecting and really needed the Renewable Energy to be produced to meet our overall content objectives. The bucket 3 resource provides flexibility in times where our product content category 1 resource isnt available and to fill in sort of the small percentages of Renewable Energy short falls that might occur because of a mismatch of supply and demand. Generally speaking, under state rules the state rps is structured to limit the number of unbundled racks, it is capped. Can you state for the record what that cap is . It is believe 15 percent of the rps requirement for the retail seller and think today that is in the range of 5 percent of the overall sales. Okay. 5 percent. And i fully understand if we had to use category 3 and if it is outside california it doesnt necessarily mean it is Unclean Energy and that there are situations where we may need to utilize that. I think my concern just stems from i think what sparked the measure in the first place or what i believe to be one of the underlying reasons for the Initiative Measure is make sure it is truly clean power and we are disclosing the right information to the customers. My last question is just what steps can puc take as we launch clean power sf just to guarantee that it is clean power and that potentially wree not utilizing certain categories where we purchase Renewable Energy credits that may not come from clean sources. Ya. Well, as i mentioned before we rin the process now of developing a request for offers for our initial power supply for clean power sf launch and that request for offers will only ask potential suppliers to deliver the bucket 1 category 1 resources to the city to supply its cca program. Under the program all resources that sell energy to resale seller have to be certified by the state and they also have to track the Renewable Energy credits they initiate with a state Accounting System called regius. All of the projects and energy we transact with for the cca program are tracked in regius and we can retire certificates and account for specific serial numbers generated. When i talk about certificates these are category one resources. Every bucket relies on Renewable Energy credits. That is the way that we are and all retail sellers verify they received what they need and we are also required to report that to the state so they can verify that we complied with the minimum state requirements. Okay, thank you. Thank you very much. So, we can open up the item for Public Comment. Any member of the public like to comment, please come forward. Good afternoon again supervisors [inaudible] eric burke representing San Francisco green party [inaudible] and also San Francisco clean energy advocates. So, specifically to what supervisor tang was just asking about, the keywe heard the details technically of what Renewable Energy credits are. The key with the measure being promoted by pge alleys is not whether renewable crediterize good or bad, the key is that ballot measure states that the sate city of San Francisco cant buy those credits but pge. That is just ridiculous and think pge alleys putting this forward should think about what it makes them look to the public. Let me get to the other important aspect of the ordinance ballot measure and that schnookler issue. I have done work on clean power sf for 11 year jz a big part is knocking on door squz calling people on the phone and i explained this to thousands of people and the number 1 comment and get from people i have to convince is, i got the thing from pge and see in their advertising that they are the greenest utility in the country because they have over 50 percent Green House Gas free electricity. The reason that pge is able to get away with that is they claim Nuclear Power is Green House Gas free and clean. Green house gas free it isnt true. Anyone who knows the Energy Industry knows that a Nuclear Power plant because [inaudible] a lot of other inputs, even given Nuclear Power plant produces from 15 percent up to fifen 0 percent of Green House Gas emissions over the life time of a gas plant. The measure you have before you will make it so that the public is able to get a actual honest accountsing of what is clean and green and end decades pgebsing the public about whether it is energy thank you very much. Any other member of the public like to comment . Good afternoon supervisors. My name is hunter sturmen with [inaudible] we have 20 thousand members working for 28 different utilities in northern california. In San Francisco it is pge and muni [inaudible] we are sponsoring the truth in energy Initiative Measure placed in the qualified ballot. Frankly if supervisor or the chair had been interested be would have participated in the presentation and gave information about the measure. As for the issue in front of the committee today we have no position on this measure at this time because we understand there has been some changes and may be changes in the future. There are 2 aspects that need to be changed and strongly urge you to amend them. The first is the measure promotes the use of Renewable Energy certificates and they are a failure. It is something we oppose frd years whether pge uses them or smud or palo alto or any other energy including clean power sf. R they do not produce renewable and promote renewable projects. They cover dirty fossil fuel power with pieces of paper. That is a rec. This changes a calculation. State law is very clear and the measure in front of you is not. Nuclear power ist norenewable, no one said it is renewable kwr no one want tooz relyoon it, but it is Green House Gas emission 3, the state of california says so it continues to be that way. It will continue to be that way until Nuclear Power plants are retired. We ask you to consider thank you very much. Any other member of the public who would like to comment . Seeing none well close Public Comment and colleagues i would like tamotion to have this very small amendment accepted into the ordinance and it is on page 3. It is adding the language, and resources set forth in the rps under public utility code 399. 30. That will be the amendment. Supervisor cohen i would like to second the motion if that was the motion. Okay. Thank you for your second and colleagues we take that without objection . The sponsor of the ordinance is not here, supervisorprez president breed but we have pr visor wiener christensen and myself back the measure. This measure wouldnt exist if it wasnt for the ibw meser mr. Sterns talked about that we talked about here in committee today. We would rather not have to go forward with it but we feel in order to protect the clean power sf program and be clear about the type of energy provided and what people who provide energy in San Francisco should provide so there is consistency this measure is Going Forward with your support colleagues. Like to motion that we move this motion to july 27 july 27, special rules committee meeting. It is amended to the monday meeting. Okay. Just to clarify on supervisor avalos amendment, i believe you circulated paper copies to the other members on the committee but to clarify the for the public, the amendment also strikes the words, and from large hide roelectric facilities including but not limit today the hetch hetchy facilities page plea line 1213 and in the very last line of that section 2102, correct the typo changing, does to do. Thank you for pointing that out. That is the amendment we have aurmd taken just to clarify. I did kind of make a motion so think have visor cohen may be seconding and supervisor tang. Im fine with the amendment. I just want to make comments before we take the vote on the measure. I brought up the question that i did because ultimately i want to insure we are able to laurch clean power sf in 2016 and it is a Competitive Program where we offer rates and they crum petitive and we provide clean power. I dont want to do anything that would harm that launch so will support the measure but think there are valid concerns but today ill support the measure before us. Great, thank you. So supervisor cohen. I dont have much to add other than i will support the measure today and seconding the amendment and i do think it is interesting one of the benefits of the democratic process is when a Initiative Comes on the ballot we have a opportunity to counter and offer different perspective but the thing that is consistent is it allowstuse talk and drill down to the issue. I think that if it were not for the measure thatthe pge measure, the issue that mr. Hunter stern spoke of, i appreciate the level of advocase and sounding an alarm to educate on your concerns. Okay, great. So, we have a motion, seconded to move this item to the july 27 special rules committee meeting. Continue to july 27. Well talk that without objection. Next item item 6 a ordinance amending the requiring the police and Sheriff Department to report data regarding detention and traffic stops. May i jump in . Good afternoon everyone. Im excited because today we bring forward before you a trangz apparent policy ordinance which is a ordinance which is a benefit to San Francisco especially the minority communities as well as helpful to the sheriff and Police Department. I have several remarks i want to share with you this afternoon. So, the reason why i suppose this ordinance that will require both the sheriff and Police Department to collect data on race and gender and gender identity during traffic stops or detains for questioning or performs a consenseual or non consenseual search of a individual. This is a expansion of the information that the Police Department is already collecting and as of now the department only collects data on race, age, sex during traffic stops. What im asking and proposing is we expand the data to include detentions, search and gender identity related to complaint. The ordinance requires each Respective Department not only to collect the information but analyze and report the data on a quarterly basis to the board of supervisors as well as Mayors Office and the Human Rights Commission as well as the police commission. This information collected will include a couple things. First, it will include the name and badge number of all officers involved. The result of the contact so for example, if the contact ended in a arrest, a citation or warning or incident report. There are 3 things that this ordinance focuses on in the spirt of preventing. We are look to prevent pretextual stops based on race and pretextual stops based on gender related characteristics. Also reporting the use of force that the results yield in a unknown injury. Over the last year or so we have seen many horrific events were Police Officers have been abuseed their power either killing or seriously injuring mostly African American or minority men. As we sit here today [inaudible] other men involved in the [inaudible] scandal still have not been terminated. African american are arrested 19 more times more often than any other race for drug crimes in San Francisco. Studies show transgendered people across the u. S. Experience Police Violence than non transgendered individuals. A Study Released in 2015 by the National Coalition of anteviolence program showed transgender wemb experience police brutlety of 5. 8 percent greater. For transgender of color that is 6. 2 times greater. I use the data and information to anchor what im trying to accomplish here. Im not making this up. Across the nation there is a movement to Reform Police practice after the tragied and out cry we have seen in [inaudible] im glad we havent seen this level of outcrine San Francisco and think that speaks to our Police Department. In response, president obama convened the 24th Century Police task force that produced a report can w a number of improvements cities should make to improve Police Relations in the community. Many Task Force Recommendations emphasize the opportunity for Police Departments to better use data and tech naumg to build trust. The Police Data Initiative is helping accelerate progress around data transparency and analysis toward the goal of increasing trust. These 2 areas within the initiative focusing on first, using open data to build transsknaerns to increase Community Trust and second, to create internal accountability and effective data analysis. At this timeat the same time i introduce this ordinance Assembly Woman shurly weber from san diego introduced a similar piece of legislation on the state level and made minor adjustments in this ordinance to reflect the language within her legislation. Passing the ordinance will make us the first mu nis palties in california and quite possibly in the u. S. And reporting requirement of the Law Enforcement agency t. Is trully my hope that the rest of the country will begin to follow our example. Im proud to Work Community advoicates on the ordinance and would like to thank each of them for their input. First of all, the office of justice has been tremendous as is the transjendser law center. Committee united against violence, Human Rights Commission is unpair lled, the office of citizens complaints thrks Youth Commission and of course the Sheriffs Department and Police Department, we worked collectively hand in hand. Colleagues you should have before you received the latest version of theords nns with additional amendments that we made. Most of these are clean up language, but one of the most significant changes we made was to the gender identity collection section. This is a interesting prudickiment. In working in sth transgendered community and the Police Department they felt that requiring Police Officers to ask a individual for their gender identity would lead to more harassment so we said complaints filed or a individual self identifies a transjoneder and experienced bias policing based on that fact. I want to acknowledge 2 letters that we received from the Youth Commission and the new crimial Justice Task Force thf Bar Association of San Francisco which acknowledges the importance of Data Collection when it come tooz Law Enforcement and transparency in the Respective Departments. Colleagues, passing this ordinance some of the goals we hope to achieve are reducing unintentional and disproportioninate numbers of detention, arrest and target of minorities and of the transgendered community. It also important creates a bench mark analysis of where we are with bias that may exist in the Law Enforcement department and hope of laying a path for the future we will begin to be free of these biases. Introducing additional transparency and ofernsight to the Police Department and rebuild the trust the community has had in the Law Enforcement department by making this Information Available for the public to review by again, requiring quarterly reporting to the Mayors Office and board of supervisors and police compligz as well as Human Rights Commission. Avenue wn has their own biases and i want to gater the data to make sure everyone in San Francisco has a safe place to live and thrive free of the unintentional targeting by officers. Colleagues i hope to have your support on this item as it continue tooz move forward. At this time i would like to specifically acknowledge lutenent carl [inaudible] from the San FranciscoPolice Department and ask him to come up to the podium to tell us more about the type of data that is collected and the new Tech Knowledge coming on line before you end i want to add a comment. For me when i saw supervisor cohen coming with this ordinance i immediately cosponsored and want to thank her for bringing this forward and think it is a useful tool for insureing Police Accountability and Stronger CommunityPolice Relations by insuring transparency in the work that the police does and think it is one step and tool related tools we can use to actually build trust between police and community so thank you for your work on this thank you for your cosponsorship my name is carl [inaudible] my current assignment is a lieutenant assigned to the chiefs office. Prior to this new assignment which started 4 days ago i was in crime analysis in the Police Department for a year and a half so it gave a opportunity to get to know what data the Police Department has and where does it originate from and what we can and cant dee for Data Collection. I just want to [inaudible] we have commander bob mozeer who is the command er of the Metro Division here with me today. After looking over the ordinance that supervisor cohen introduced we started to go through that and put together a quick team of people. Susan merit who is the chief Information Officer for the Police Department as well as brad rusy who is kepty city attorney. The 4 of us have met and discussed exactly what information we are collecting now and what we would be required to collect pursuant to the ordinance. Having done that, there is areas such as arrest which we already know the break down of race and sex of everybody we arrest. As far as use of force included in there, we know that already also so we dont need to change existing systems to gather that. As far as traffic stops we have been doing it for years, gathering traffic stop data of the race, the reez frn the stop, whether they were searched several areas we track. The ordinance will require we