we saw what happened when the extreme far-right tried to take over in last year s midterm elections. it was a debacle for the republican party. it is why mccarthy has had a narrow majority. in fact, we now have some new evidence of just how much damage the trump backed mauve right did. there is a study at maricopa county arizona, that s of course home of the capital phoenix, most important electoral counting that state. it analyzed how many republican voters did not vote for certain republican candidates, including kari lake for governor, blake masters for senate, and mark finchem for secretary of state. now, all three were full maga election deniers, endorsed by donald trump. all three of them lost. the study found lake lost 35% of voters who most otherwise mostly voted republicans. masters lost more than 6%. finchem, about 8%. that is an enormous, enormous electoral penalty, as sort of maga attacks on these candidates. in a closely divided state, is not a resume for political success
three-way race between himself, sinema, republican amani, and say that s about as evenly divided as it was. and running against cinema from the left is not necessarily gonna work. instead, he s framing his fight as a kind of populist one. okay, well, he plans to cross the state, painting cinemas out of touch, and himself, he s a fighter for the working people of arizona. there which and the powerful, they don t need more advocates. it s the people that are still trying to decide between groceries and utilities. they need a fighter for them. there is no lobbyist for working families. we could argue different ways about how to do it, but at the core, if you are more likely to be meeting with a powerful than the power less, you are doing this job incorrectly. congressman guy ago will have more to say when he joins lawrence o donnell tonight at 10 pm. and in fact, looking at senators like mark kelly, rachel warnock, they were able to win in 50 states biden
come from the left. did not just come from people who are upset about the outcome of the dobbs decision. it was bigger than that, it was a question of displace, that was supposed to stand for fairness. and process, and integrity. what am i supposed to think of this investigation if these nine people weren t questioned in the same rigorous way as a buddy else? as you know, a basic principle of the law is the idea that we are all equal under it. in fact that is inscribed on the supreme court itself. the building right there, equal justice under law. so the other maps the court had a piece about some of the publicly observable tensions in the way that members of the court, the justices, have been speaking to each other. and also, and their written decisions to instill public knowledge. it seems to point to a very
ranging into their 70s. the family of one woman killed said she spent years going to monterey park dance hall on weekends. the folks were to celebrate when so many of us are savoring that feeling following years of having large gatherings due to the pandemic. police haven t named the model of gun, but they describe a semiautomatic pistol with an extended magazine. the kind the sheriff described as illegal in the state. there are certain patterns in the distinctly american shootings. most of them are men, as in this case, but then there are also deviations. they are usually younger, this suspect was 72, a rarity. do you give you 90 of the scope of this, each image is from a different mastering over the past five and a half years. this was the 33rd mass shooting this year. there have been four more since then. in fact, this afternoon, two students were fatally shot. an adult was injured in des moines, iowa.
as what she described was having conversations with the justices. it clearly wasn t the same thing as what was being done to employees. well, i also want to point out that the complaints that i heard from sources did not just come from the left. did not just come from people who were upset about the outcome of the dobbs decision. it was bigger than that, it was this question of, this place is supposed to stand for fairness and process. integrity. what am i supposed to think of this investigation if these nine people weren t questioned in the same rigorous way as everybody else. as you know, a basic principle of the law is the idea that we are all equal under it. a fact that is inscribed on the supreme court itself, the building right there, equal justice under law. stephen, who governs court, had a piece in the atlantic about some of the publicly observable