Or do whatever you do we have the tv here tonight you dont want your phone to be the one that rings on national television. I will be running around with a wireless microphone if you have a question please raise your hand and wait for me to get to you. That way it is picked up for the recording as well if you decide you like to have a copy of the book after the talk head back into the store to pick up a copy or two or three. Then come right back to sign them. Listing to a better planet. To take action on Climate Change and water shortages and air pollution. This is a practical solution to sustainability also environmental leaders from across the political spectrum professor of financial law at environmental studies from the former head Connecticut Department of protection and is highly qualified to have written this book. The book includes fresh thinking on topics free ranging from big data Environmental Justice to fracking and systems analysis public land so there is a lot in this boo
Of commons. In 20 seventies the Party Leaders have been traveling the countrys tonight they will defend and deconstruct their ideas live Justin Trudeau and conservative leader in the green party and also maxine from the Peoples Party the goal is to convince you to give their party or vote those of the most respected political journalists with the museum of history here are your leaders. [applause] [applause] i am one of the moderators tonight the audience is made up of undecided voters gathered here in the round so they are right at the heart of this night. One note we have asked them to hold their applause throughout the debate so we can keep things moving and to tackle five major themes based on the question of canadian voters want asked and debated there are more than 8000 the leaders will answer them based on the order selected that were drawn. Viewers want answers they have all agreed to respect the time they are allowed tonight and we will all make sure they do. The first is lead
Distinguished president of congress, distinguished president of the senate, mr. Prime minister, ladies and gentlemen, members of the government, distinguished members of the national assembly, distinguished senators, in article 18 the constitution says that the president may take the floor before parliament convened in congress for this purpose, and styles it is indeed necessary to do so. We are living through such a time right now. On the 17th of may the french gave me a clear mandate. 18th of june they applied the strength of that message electing a large parliamentarian majority to the national assembly. Today i would want to tell but the mandate entrusted to us by the people. I want to tell but the institutions he which i want to change and the Guiding Principles that i wish to follow in my action. A thousand different ways led us to here and to this place to today you and me because we feel the same desire to serve the country even though this desire may not have the same form or
Support Edward Snowden and chelsea madden, private manning and to remember that lineage that atm with the Citizens Commission to investigate the f. Era. Thank you very much. Thank you. [applause] for people in the back. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible] so is conviction that the fbi office was worth breaking into mustve been based on more than just antipathy for the fbi. Id like to know what does he know about the fbi the email of, which convinced him to take this rather drastic action. I can answer that question. We talked about it quite a bit. He had no file on the fbi, but what he had was a strong perception that turned out to beetroot. He thought that Jay Edgar Hoover was a consummate bureaucrat and i saturate keep greatly detailed files on everything, including documents about how to deal dissent. He didnt have any idea that dirty tricks that would involve in dealing with such a thing. But he thought the jay crew affair would require the meticulous records to be kept up everyt
I have one question so far which i think touches a little bit on that. What do the stagnation and end of innovation days not recognize when they face that . The great stagnation, his argument has used this plateau. You are painting quite a different picture. Hes a super smart guy and we discussed it with him. He really inspired us to work on that first book, race against the machine. When we read his book because he was arguing we had run out of innovation and it was just no more good things, a few good things left to invent. Hanging around a place like mit media lab, we thought that cant possibly be true. Is this guy looking at the same economy we are looking at is the question we had. On the other hit some compelling data about the stagnation of meeting and, and that reinforced us to think hard about how this could be happening. And thats where we came up with this recognition that just because meeting income is stagnating, that doesnt mean innovation is stagnating. In fact, paradoxi