ri tonight on all in. so, we just stormed the effing capital. january 6th will be a day in infamy. the proud boys will stand back and stand by for sentencing. we have secured the convictions of leaders of both the proud boys and the oath keepers for seditious conspiracy. our work will continue. tonight, the guilty verdict for donald trump s footsoldiers and congressman, jamie raskin, on the connective tissue from the leaders of the mob, to the man who sent them. then another supreme court ethics blockbuster. the same megadonor treating clarence thomas 11th vacations and paying his mother s rent is caught paying the private school tuition that child thomas raises his son. plus, the prosecution rests in the trump civil rape trial, as the accused is offered a second chance to testify. and the mysterious case of a formerly pro abortion north carolina democrat, now suddenly voting with republicans to restrict abortion access. all in starts right now. good evening from new y
so, we just stormed the [bleep] capital. january 6th will be a day in infamy. the proud boys will stand back and stand by for sentencing. we have secured the convictions of leaders of both the proud boys and the oath keepers for seditious conspiracy. our work will continue. tonight, the guilty verdict for donald trump s footsoldiers and congressman, jamie raskin, on the connective tissue from the leaders of the mob, to the man who sent them. then another supreme court ethics blockbuster. the same megadonor treating clarence thomas 11th vacations and paying his mother s rent is caught paying the private school tuition that child thomas raises his son. plus, the prosecution rests in the trump civil rape trial, as the accused is offered a second chance to testify. and the mysterious case of a formerly pro abortion north carolina democrat, now suddenly voting with republicans to restrict abortion access. all in starts right now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes.
branches. should supreme court justices be held to the same standard as any and all other public servants? the senate judiciary committee held a hearing on the ethical standards or lack thereof for supreme court justices a topic that has come up in light of new reporting on repeated failures by justices to disclose details of lavish vacations, travel, gifts, even real estate transactions, testifying on behalf of democrats, a former federal judge and group of legal experts, guests invited by republicans included a former attorney general. more notable than who testified was who did not. chief justice john roberts declined an invitation from the committee, something dick durbin brought up at the start of today s hearing. in his letter last week the chief justice sent a statement of ethics principles and practices. it was a document that was attacheded to his letter. it is an extraordinary document. not in a good way. it makes clear while the justices are fine with consulting
barbara located, who served as the u.s. attorney for the eastern district of michigan, where she was the one who prosecuted that seditious conspiracy case against members of the hutaree militia. brian, let me start with you. as someone who covered this trial, and it was a complicated trial. it was a long trial. much longer than 90% of trials that have been in america. i m pulling it out of my head, but i think that s right. were you surprised by this conclusion? i don t think i was terribly surprised. i was kind of surprised about who the jury actually struggled over. i mean, honestly, in my mind, it was enrique tarrio one, which was going to be the toughest struggle for them to reach on the seditious conspiracy charge. but, you know, now that it comes out, you can very much follow the logic of what the jurors it, and that s always nice to see, when you can say okay, i see what they did with the evidence here, right? in this case, i think what they saw is that the individual, dominic
of the hutaree militia. brian, let me start with you. as someone who covered this trial, and it was a complicated trial. it was a long trial. much longer than 90% of trials that have been in america. i m pulling it out of my head, but i think that s right. were you surprised by this conclusion? i don t think i was terribly surprised. i was kind of surprised about who the jury actually struggled over. i mean, honestly, in my mind, it was enrique tarrio one, which was going to be the toughest struggle for them to reach on the seditious conspiracy charge. but, you know, now that it comes out, you can very much follow the logic of what the jurors it, and that s always nice to see, when you can say okay, i see what they did with the evidence here, right? in this case, i think what they saw is that the individual, dominic pezzola, who smashed that window open without stolen police shield, he wasn t in communication with so many of the other proud boys as much as the other members of this c