This report represents the research and views of the author. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Center on Global Energy Policy. The piece may be subject to further revision.
In-Person & Virtual Conference | November 7-10, 2021 San Diego, California
Deadline: July 26 The Annual Meeting Planning Working Group (AMPWG) issues the Call for Presentations for the 2021 Annual Meeting at the upcoming event scheduled for November 7-10, 2021. This will be a hybrid event with in-person only sessions and in-person with livestream sessions (for a virtual audience). We are looking for submissions for both types of sessions. There will be two ways the Annual Meeting sessions will be delivered:
In-person sessions with highly interactive elements (at least 30% of session slot must be interactive) (not delivered to virtual audience)
In-person sessions with typical panels or speaker presentations (delivered also to virtual audience via Livestream)
they depict him as the more violent of the two. after we found the video tape and seen who was the aggressor, pablo is secondary. he s the second one in the door. he has a stick versus a gun initially. seth was the aggressor on video. it s embarrassing to be tried in a public setting like that and it s just spread all around the world because you have friends out there. the family i had left at the time, they see it and friends of the family see it. it s embarrassing. you don t want everybody to look at you as this bad person. as in the first trial, his lawyer argues it s impossible to identify the gunman on the surveillance tape. the enhancement process was terrible.
this time, authorities try him separately from his codefendant. they depict him as the more violent of the two. after we found the video tape and seeing who was the aggressor, pablo is secondary. he s the second one in the door. he has a stick versus a gun initially. seth was the aggressor on video. it s embarrassing to be tried in a public setting like that and it s just spread all around the world because you have friends out there. the family i had left at the time, they see it and friends of the family see it. it s embarrassing. you don t want everybody to look at you as this bad person. as in the first trial, his lawyer argues it s impossible to identify the gunman on the surveillance tape. the enhancement process was terrible. the pixel thing where you start
they depict him as the more violent of the two. after we found the video tape and seen who was the aggressor, pablo is secondary. he s the second one in the door. he has a stick versus a gun initially. seth was the aggressor on video. it s embarrassing to be tried in a public setting like that and it s just spread all around the world because you have friends out there. the family i had left at the time, they see it and friends of the family see it. it s embarrassing. you don t want everybody to look at you as this bad person. as in the first trial, his lawyer argues it s impossible to identify the gunman on the surveillance tape. the enhancement process was terrible. the pixel thing where you start to break down the lines. the truth is, you couldn t enhance the video. the attorneys argument can t compete with the emotional impact of the video. the trial ends with jurors convicting him of all three murders. in a separate proceeding, pablo aybar is found guilty.