Here illegally, return legally after the return to the home country, you would be opposed to that . I would encourage you to think about the whole range of so you dont want to answer that question. Again, your answer is you want all or nothing. Thats i didnt say that. I am encouraging the congress i know comprehensive solution to this problem. Would the gentleman yield asked if i may, the my time at the gentlemans time has expired. , but that you would recognize the gentleman for an additional minute to yield. I just note that really its up to the congress to decide what to legislate and the secretary doesnt get to decide. I yield back. And every clean my time and i agree with that, but the position of the said administration as has been demonstrated by the secretary and has been construed by a lot of the comments that anybody other side and by the president is that they want an all or nothing approach. I think thats rather unfortunate because we i dont think thats what the secretary s
Should be derived strategically. We tend to look at strategy as linking and balancing, hence ways and means. Then we look at the results and risk. We believe that, at the end of the day, our strategy is reflected in the qdr. It is fundamentally about protecting our National Security interests. If we understand what those are and that some are more important than others, not only does this enable us to offer advice on when and how to use force, it means we can link those interests on how to allocate everincreasing means that are provided by congress. And in between the ends and the means lies the Fertile Ground of ways, and how we go about getting it all done. And how resourceful we can be in crafting those ways. The tougher we are on ourselves and how we manage a resources, the better we can conserve our ends. One of the most important ways is deterrence, which really comes in two forms. One is showing an adversary that we can deny objective. In other words, his attacks will fail. Alte
BEIJING, Apr. 10 (Gwadar pro)-A report was published on April 8th by the Center for Global & Strategic Studies in review of a group discussion themed “Dialogue of Civilisations” jointly organised by a research center and the Communication University China (CUC). The necessity and route of civilisation dialogue, especially that between Pakistan and China, are highlighted.
The significance of dialogue holds far beyond a facilitator of daily conversation pursuant to the report. In today’s globalised world where multipolarity, cultural diversity, economic globalization, and integration is becoming the new norm, comprehensive dialogue among civilizations enables nations to understand and respect each other’s cultures and replace estrangement, clash, and hierarchy with exchange, mutual learning, and peaceful coexistence.