british museum, rather than being sold independently outside, but there are also a number of gems which, they also had doubts about, so at the moment, we re just waiting clarity on a statement from the british museum that we did receive in the last hour or so, whereas they say it was frustrating that an individual, did, they believe, have more items in their possession and that if they had revealed that, it would have aided their investigations. of course, does not take away from the main facts of the case, if it is true that items from the british museum did end up being sold independently, outside museum, how did that happen, what is the security like the british museum, and also, just as crucially, just the british museum respond to initial complaints of allegations put to it in a timely and proportionate manner? now there is a police investigation under way and
damning willing end up being. todd: how should people fight back against this? require representatives to take action and call on congress to have a testimony to call durham, to call the people that are directly involved in this scheme and hold them accountable. this should not be brushed under the carpet. todd: how should the american people take this durham report and operationalize it? what should we do going forward? we ve seen that the federal government isn t going to hold themselves accountable any way, shape or form. you are right, votes matter. go vote these people out and hold the d.o.j. accountable. this is not the rank and file. i ve worked with the fbi for
if they were campaign funds, we d be having a different discussion.e1 we d be talking about how he used campaign funds and they d be paying for an indictment as i said earlier. what this investigation may r end up being is about the essentially falsifying business records which by the way, this prosecutor has brought over 60, this one and the previous one n% brought it over 60 times over the last four years. this is not an unusual crime to charge someone with in the q manhattanfáxd district attorney office. oh, no. oh, chuck,t( you couldn t be mo wrong whenu statement. there s first of all, it s a case of first impressi/oh ju+hju$is country has this been done before. never in the manhattan attorney s office has someone been charged with a crime for falsifying business records to ■ pay hush money, as they call it or a confidential settlement in legal jargon regarding a personal matter. n the history o÷s @■ manhattan districb@gttorney s qq