meadows claim. he really is somebody who s seen to have so far exceeded the scope of his official duties by corrupting and weaponizing the department of justice, and interfering in a state election. you know, once we get a decision in the mark meadows case, then you are going to see other defendants lineup to try and take their shot. amy lee copeland, i had my doubts about anyone who wasn t a federal employee being covered by this removal statute until i read it today. what it refers to, any officer, any officer of the united states, any officer, in parentheses, or any person acting under that officer, and we already have these fake electors saying, i was acting under donald trump, people in this case who have no federal employment affiliation who were saying they were acting under the direction of federal officers.
case, then you are going to see other defendants lineup to try and take their shot. amy lee copeland, i had my doubts about anyone who wasn t a federal employee being covered by this removal statute until i read it today. what it refers to, any officer, any officer of the united states, any officer, in parentheses, or any person acting under that officer, and we already have these fake electors saying, i was acting under donald trump, people in this case who have no federal employment affiliation who were saying they were acting under the direction of federal officers. that s what they are saying in their motions. i read mr. stills motioned the most carefully. what he says as he walked into a room, in the georgia state house, sitting there were attorneys, and attorneys told him that this was all perfectly legitimate. what i think is really interesting in this case, there
how much the judge knew about the extent of mr. steele s employment affiliation in terms of who was he working for? now we know he knew some of the information. how much detail was provided is certainly a matter of concern. nothing in the memo truly got into the details because we have a summary, not the full application. shannon: with that in mind, we ve got to go. i want to ask you yes or no do you think the fisa application should object would ever go public? ken? yes, part of it. at least part of it has got to become part of it just to clear the air. shannon: bradley, ken thank you for lending us your legal expertise. former trump campaign carter page is the guy. he s taking yahoo news and the huffington post to court. why he says today s court bolsters those claims against those entities. our legal eagles will take that up next in night court. at legalzoom, our network of attorneys can help you
how much the judge knew about the extent of mr. steele s employment affiliation in terms of who was he working for? now we know he knew some of the information. how much detail was provided is certainly a matter of concern. nothing in the memo truly got into the details because we have a summary, not the full application. shannon: with that in mind, we ve got to go. i want to ask you yes or no do you think the fisa application should object would ever go public? ken? yes, part of it. at least part of it has got to become part of it just to clear the air. shannon: bradley, ken thank you for lending us your legal expertise. former trump campaign carter page is the guy. he s taking yahoo news and the huffington post to court. why he says today s court bolsters those claims against those entities. our legal shawn evans: it s 6 am. 40 million americans are waking up to a gillette shave. and at our factory in boston,