The navy turned it down. Finally, about six or eight months ago we found two sites and we asked the navy again and they refused. But this time they actually gave us an answer and they said that they really didnt want a dog park because it was too detrimental to the ground. It tore up the ground. And, you know, they didnt want it. And, so, shortly after that we found that the radiation sites had there had been more sites that had opened up. And, so, we find that its a little bit strange that this all happened at this particular time. And were sort of wondering why did this happen at this particular point in time and who is involved and who knew and when. One of the things i really want to talk about is that, for the record, im very much for this redevelopment because im not certain how much longer i can take twice weekly blackouts and roads that havent been repaired and cannot be repaired because its too costly. The state apparently has to come supervise the digging of the roads up and,
The hearing today, i just want to let you know that thats something that our office is working on. Were convening the Public Utilities commission and the City Administrators Office and tida to see what we can do to support the aging infrastructure through which our electricity runs through. As many of you know, this is the infrastructure that well, actually we havent inherited yet, but its currently owned by the u. S. Navy. Its aging. They havent put in the investment to improve it mainly because when the new Development Goes in, were going to set up an entirely new grid for electricity. That being said, we have residents on the island today that depend on that infrastructure and we need to figure out a solution to that issue. And im hoping that well be able to announce something over the next couple of weeks that we would be able to serve the residents. I apologize. I know it is impacting your daily life but i wanted to address that before we start the hearing. So, without further ado
The navy or their contractors by our regulatory agencies . Our understanding and our records and review of the records that we have is that the states lead Regulatory Department of agency, toxic and substance control hasnt issued violations to the navy or their contractors. Shaw environmental, who is the navys contractor on this work, did receive a notice of violation from the California Department of Public Health, the agency that had been conducting these scans that we talked about, on june 23rd, 2011. These violations a notice of violation is a statement that says, you need to correct these problems. And all of those violations, those problems were corrected by shaw to the satisfaction of the California Department of Public Health. Okay. So, during this time we only have one reported notice of violation, that was to shaw, in june 2011 and they have since abated addressed and abated that [speaker not understood] . That is the information we have, yes. Now, let me say that they contin
technical conclusions. but it was speculation. he was asked to speculate, he speculated. you know, the term speculation, that s a description that you provide. but in this case, you know, you have the ceo of this company that oversees the clean up making that statement. i just think it s a concern. i can understand why you might feel that way. thank you. so, now i want to move on to the oversight and monitoring issue. so, i heard over and over again that residents have seen trucks come off the island without tarps on top of the trucks. and also sometimes what s happening where dust is kicked up in the air. it s dusty and dirty. [speaker not understood]. i had some questions. actually, the question was asked that night, but at the time the navy didn t have this information. how many notice of violations have been issued to date for the navy or their contractors by our regulatory agencies? our understanding and our records and review of the records that we have is tha