Justice Chandra Dhari Singh observed that merely because MPIDSA was functioning separately from the Defence Ministry "does not mean" that it is "independent of the control of the Government".
The PIL, filed by advocates Sakshi Raghav and Akash Vajpai, contends that CLAT (UG) examination “discriminates” and fails to provide a “level playing field” to students whose educational backgrounds are rooted in regional languages.
The bench called the advertisement “untruthful” to the extent that it reflected that a toilet cleaned by Domex would emanate fragrance, while the one cleaned by Harpic would emanate a foul smell.