Dear Reader
We are the only publication of our kind, dedicated to exploring science and technology
as a cultural project that might elevate our humanity or degrade it.
The upheaval of the pandemic presents a trial for us as a nonprofit supported by our readers and an opportunity: You are one of over a million people who have visited our website over the past year, the most in our history.
But to truly expand our national leadership in countering the excesses of scientism and technocracy,
we need to grow the community of readers who support our work by subscribing.
wonderful, great, learning tool, but sometimes, should get off line, read a book uninterrupted and tap into your higher cognitive abilities. our brains are wired to adapt and change and indeed they re changing and not necessarily for the better. dave: and tj, it s not just google, we turn to wikipedia and look at the first two lines to define the person s life. are we not looking into subjects. you can skim, but go deep are. there were more books published than the first 300 years. are they read? people are buying more books. electronic books, i like to read it on my kindle and ipad and deep are going deeper, never been easier to become an expert and go deep on a subject. that s exactly what you want to try and attempt to do, but i think the reality. just look what you do when you go online, reading about one,
distribution is a great way to improve upon a platform but the problem with magazines is the platform, itself. because it delivers content that isn t keeping up with the way that we get our news right now. i don t think just because you read a magazine on the i-pad it s going to make it more interesting and make people want to subscribe to it. make it easier to carry. it does. but it ll be interesting to see how it works out. interestingly enough, i-books, electronic books, 600,000 downloaded so far. really. people are reading on these devices. they re not just toys. i have known you for a couple years and i ve never seen you so fired up about anything. i feel the need to defend kate gosselin s celebrity because it is what allows her to be a mother in a very difficult situation. i agree. i just wouldn t take it as an insult hugh heffner didn t want me in playboy. no. we can discard the hugh heffner part of that. didn t they beat american idol in the ratings on da