Is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is signed by our Historic Preservat
Is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is signed by our Historic Preservat
Museum way. I think two modestsized project would work belter. So i dont mind the project asis. I mind how we got here and would like to understand that more. Commissioner moore i would be interested to know if any penalties have been levied. The other issue is, in 2013, to answer somebodys question and giv given direction at that time, the project wouldnt have been considered for demolition because we had clear direction that no units would be destroyed. Weve moved away from that a little bit for other reasons, but in 2013, there would have been no demolition supported on this property. Commissioner richards . Commissioner richards i move to propose an indefinite continuance until we get more information from dbi on their documentation and that it wasnt lawful. Second. I will only advise that indefinite continuance will require renoticing the entire project. Commissioner richards lets go three months. Very good. I think the project requires more time to come back here than three month
Wasnt according to plans . Yes. Why are these things happening . Im flabbergasted that this person can keep stamping plans and falsifying documents. I think that would be you can add that the staff can certainly add that to the information we get. Commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson i would like to support not a sixmonth continuance. It needs to be shorter. We need answers from the Building Department and hear this project and decide. I would say last week in february, february 28. 2 1 2 months from now. Commissioner richards lets stick with three months. Commissioner moore . Commissioner moore we can continue and the architect can tell us if or the staff. So theres an amended motion. Seconder is okay with march 15 . On the motion then to continue the matter to march 15 with direction from the commission. Commissioner fong aye. Commissioner johnson aye. Commissioner moore aye. Commissioner koppel aye. Commissioner melger aye. Commissioner richards aye. President hillis aye. Tha
Lawful. Second. I will only advise that indefinite continuance will require renoticing the entire project. Commissioner richards lets go three months. Very good. I think the project requires more time to come back here than three months, including redesigning at a minimum the conditions that the department had established, because i will not go against the Department Recommendation in front of us. Three months would put us at march 15 or april 12. Im okay with three months. I dont think its a complicated project or its a good test case for us to get understanding from dbi and their process and it may be that were able to use this as an example for if you dont agree to the three months, what do you propose . Commissioner moore i would suggest six months or if the architect is in the room, perhaps we could ask him. Who is the architect . Mr. Santoss name is on the drawing. If hes in the room, perhaps he could speak to being able to able to do the work required in that time. Commissioner