And outrageous becomes normalized. And people start thinking we should be grading on a curve. But i can tell you from the interactions that ive had over the last eight or nine days with foreign leaders, that this serious business. You actually have to know what youre talking about, and you actually have to have done your homework. When you speak, it should actually reflect thoughtout policy that you can implement. And i have confidence that if, in fact, people just listen to what he has to say and look at his track record or lack thereof, that theyll make a good decision. Reporter you know, on this trip, white house sources have told us that the president has been wanting to get back out on the Campaign Trail, but his schedule really hasnt allowed him to do that. He sees the enormous stakes involved. He watches the poll numbers, and he knows the power of his own voice among democrats, among young people to get out there and vote, which is going to be critical, of course, in this electi
here. biden or vice president pence, when this came up, they were asked to look for documents. they sent people to look. when they found them, they called the fbi. the fbi did a search in biden s summer home in rehoboth. there was no allegation of hiding, obstruction, of moving things around. those are simple case. you re looking for intent. the hillary clinton discussion is more worthy and more complicated. here s the differences. in hillary clinton s case, she was using a private e-mail server because she wanted to avoid the freedom of information act and personal information and communication coming out. she conducted a lot of state department business there. after going through 30,000 e-mails, the fbi found 52 e-mail chains. let me stop you there. she deleted 30,000 e-mails. they were retrieved by the fbi.
was hillary clinton treated differently? we just played james comey. 110 e-mails, 52 e-mail chains, eight of the chains top-secret. 36 secret, eight confidential but no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute. may i add, that is only 30,000 e-mails. that does not include the 33,000. he said in that same speech we were not able to see any intent. was their intent when hillary clinton use bleach bit to delete e-mails? was their intent to obstruct when they destroy devices? of course every case is different on its facts. that s why the special prosecutor should have been appointed. i am asking a very specific question. comey said there was no intent. i agree with you. that s why there should have been a comparative. there shouldn t have been assigned to investigate one person. they should have investigated hillary clinton, president biden, pence, sandy berger.
what about ism is going to resonate that he is trying to play right now? the what about ism is intense right now. you are somebody that definitely knows facts on this case. 2 how cute the left-wing media found a new word. what about ism? maybe another term that they can replace it with would be equal justice under the law and equal application of our laws and the lack thereof in america today. let s use comey and his own words. no reasonable prosecutor would ever prosecute or charge hillary clinton despite her serious misconduct. pay close attention. top-secret classified material. she shouldn t have had it and that does not include the 33,000 deleted e-mails. from the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the state department in 2014, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency
and there were also similarities. we don t know the full extent of the similarities because we don t know much. we re not getting a lot of answers here from the government. but those documents at mar a-lago were housed in a storage room protected by secret service. the fbi had no idea where the rest of the documents were and were not inclined to send agents to look as opposed to unknown, uncleared private counsel. sean: jonathan turley, as always, grated insight. we appreciate you being with us. time for the hannity hot seat. the topic is, are the media treating biden differently than donald trump and hillary clinton on the subject of classified material? here to answer fox news contributor richard fowler. explain to me, richard, if it was such a big deal, why in july of 2016 when james comey laid out all of hillary s top secret classified information, e-mail chains on her server. now that we know we never found