individuals, some of whom were culpable in multiple security incidents. daemonic security has issued 23 violations and seven infraction. incidents. this number will likely change, it says, as the review progresses. the state department notification to grassley who is overseeing this review does not identify individuals by name, but fox news was first to report the key aides huma abiden and jake sullivan sent unsecured materials through clinton s server prompting the investigation in 2015. despite the two-year f.b.i. investigation no one was charged with mishandling classified information even though james comey confirmed in july 2016 that seven email chains were classified at the top secret special access program level when they were sent or received by clinton s team. they are among the u.s. government s most closely guarded secrets, sean. sean: great investigative work as always.gr thank you so much for sharing
as the special counsel so there are many more pages to be turned here but this clearly was the end of a big chapter. okay. so we re trying to find out how much we ll learn from the attorney general and i want to go back. i want to play what the fbi director said about the clinton e-mail investigation. watch this. we did not find clear evidence secretary clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws, there is everyday they were extremely careless in their handling of classified information. for example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the top secret special access program at the time they were sent and received. those chains involved secretary clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails about those same matters. there is evidence to support a
charge and mandate that he had as the special counsel so there are many more pages to be turned here but this clearly was the end of a big chapter. okay. so we re trying to find out how much we ll learn from the attorney general and i want to go back. i want to play what the fbi director said about the clinton e-mail investigation. watch this. we did not find clear evidence secretary clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws, there is everyday they were extremely careless in their handling of classified information. for example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the top secret special access program at the time they were sent and received. those chains involved secretary clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails about those same matters. there is evidence to support a
all of that stuff someone has to be held accountable. laura: 110 emails and people forget so much has happened the past year and a half, 110 emails and 52 email chains with contained classified information, dan bongino i think it is important to go back and remind the viewers what james comey james comey said infamous july 2016 press conference. it was a nonindictment indictment. let s watch. although we did not find clear evidence, secretary clinton or colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classification, there is evidence they were extremely careless in their handling a very sensitive highly classified information. we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. laura: well, gross negligence, of course, is the standard.
documents destruction of evidence. all of that stuff someone has to be held accountable. laura: 110 emails and people forget so much has happened the past year and a half, 110 emails and 52 email chains with contained classified information, dan bongino i think it is important to go back and remind the viewers what james comey james comey said infamous july 2016 press conference. it was a nonindictment indictment. let s watch. although we did not find clear evidence, secretary clinton or colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classification, there is evidence they were extremely careless in their handling a very sensitive highly classified information. we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. laura: well, gross negligence, of course, is the