The National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”), Mumbai Bench, comprising of Mr. Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) and Mr. Prabhat Kumar (Technical Member), dismissed an application and held that.
Among the Bills passed in the recent session of the Parliament is the Mediation Bill, 2023. This Bill has the potential to reframe how we understand access to justice in India. After more than.
Here s what the Supreme Court and High Courts of India had to say this week thenorthlines.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thenorthlines.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
, High Court of Delhi held that mere fact that S. 9 proceedings entail disputed facts would be no ground to reject the S. 9 petition as in the Section 9 proceedings, there are bound to be disputed facts which are to be adjudicated in arbitration, by the Arbitral Tribunal agreed upon by the parties. The Court, in a Section 9 proceeding, is merely required to consider the grant/non-grant of interim measures claimed, applying the same principles as applicable to disposal of applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The Court further held that it is not as if in exercise of powers under Section 9, no mandatory relief can be granted.
(
Booz Allen ), wherein it was
held that in eviction or tenancy matters which are governed by
special statues and where tenant enjoys statutory protection as a class is a matter of public interest and only the
specified court has been conferred exclusive jurisdiction to
adjudicate the same.
Later, in 2017, the issue regarding arbitrability of lease
dispute was once again re-visited by the Supreme Court in the case
of
Himangi Enterprises and after relying on the said
ratios of
Booze Allen and
Natraj Studios the
court rejected the application filed by the tenant (defendant)
under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996