pretty vague question. do you want to be more specific about that? dupe to be more specific? in general, social media, bullying things of that nature. oh, you mean tweeting? okay i was trying to understand what you re coming from. i want this president to succeed, you know, why i want this president to succeed because i want this country to succeed. that s why i work closely with this president to make sure he succeeds so our country succeeds. we have a very important agenda we re trying to put in place to improve people s lives. to lift the economy, make it healthier. so, these are the things we re working on and those are the things my kids see me working on. now, when it comes to leading by example, we do this ourselves, and so we define ourselves by our own actions and are if control of our own actions. do i wish there d less tweeting,
civil rights, voting rights, you can argue about whether this is a good thing. it s certainly the trump agenda. what it s all about is russia and how fixated the president is on the unfairness he proceeds of this investigation and he blames sessions for it. policy doesn t matter. it raises the question of whether playing checkers is a smart move in a chess game involvings is. he is why. if you don t get rid of sessions, mueller comes out with his findings and it is we found this and this, but nothing really major. he is a back stop for president trump. if he removes sessions and you put in someone else who is invariably going to be seen as a dupe, when mueller comes out
meeting to get dirt on your opponent, these red flags waving in your face you wouldn t. the other iron in the fire would be and by the way, this was innocent. it was only about the sanctions anyway, that lawyer was a dupe and goldstone is one of the most prolific liars we have ever seen in public life before. meanwhile i want to get this in before you respond, wall street journal rupert murdoch owned property has a pretty scathing editorial this morning about how the trumps have mishandled much of it. mr. trump somehow seems to believe his outside personality and social media following make him larger than the presidency. he s wrong. enhis family seem oblivious to the brutal realities of washington politics. those reality also destroy mr. trump his family and their business reputation unless they change their strategy towards the russia probe. they don t have much more time to do it. remind me of the warnings
play ball. but for the russians here, they re playing on hostile territory. all they need to do is send some dups to that meeting to make sure they re not arrested and the fbi doesn t come and that is a signal that the a dupe perhaps it could be certainly that you could extract i don t want to use the word blackmail but compromise somebody down the road. this is a testing of the waters. you re absolutely right. you re testing to see willingness here, to see whether they re going to set you up. if the russian intelligence made it clear to me they wanted to talk about cooperating and i d
some potential exposure and are trying to protect them zfselves against it. i will be a little more charitable than the word dupe, which was used by my previous guest when he talked about those that were sent to the meeting. is it possible that those that were sent to the meeting, they just weren t aware of the rules? they were political neophytes? i don t buy it. i think it s pretty you can be a political neophyte and know you shouldn t be dealing with foreign interests and have a party come to the table from russia. i don t think i think even that s kind of a rookie mistake. i don t think that any of them have been dealing in business for years and years, they knew i think what they were getting themselves into. i think i don t think anyone here was duped. what about jared kushner, revising his federal disclosure form. he s done it three times now from the original input there. could this be a problem for him? you know, i think so. i think you are hearing a lot