willingly engaged in the kind of contact that is absolutely illegal, so this notion of him as a dupe is just ridiculous. he s an adult male who should be judged that way. one other quick thing about michael cohen. we have been talking about michael cohen in the context of stormy daniels. i just want to remind viewers that michael cohen is mentioned four times in the steele dossier. the idea that michael cohen is a fixer on the stormy daniels front for trump but not in some ways implicated in the other stuff mueller is looking at is ridiculous. he s a key player across both sides of all the troubles that are facing the trump white house. okay, i want rick and mike to weigh in, but first, rick, i m going to get you. this is from this is the wall street journal. this is a quote from them talking about preparing the president for a mueller interview. an informal four-hour practice session, mr. trump s lawyers were only able to walk him through two questions given the
willingly engaged in the kind of contact that is absolutely illegal, so this notion of him as a dupe is just ridiculous. he s an adult male who should be judged that way. one other quick thing about michael cohen. we have been talking about michael cohen in the context of stormy daniels. i just want to remind viewers that michael cohen is mentioned four times in the steele dossier. the idea that michael cohen is a fixer on the stormy daniels front for trump but not in some ways implicated in the other stuff mueller is looking at is ridiculous. he s a key player across both sides of all the troubles that are facing the trump white house. okay, i want rick and mike to weigh in, but first, rick, i m going to get you. this is from this is the wall street journal. this is a quote from them talking about preparing the president for a mueller interview. an informal four-hour practice session, mr. trump s lawyers were only able to walk him
that, or whether they were being innocent, they were part of a dupe, so to speak, that she was sent in there to tempt them to do something, and they either did or didn t do it. that s a big question that goes to the heart of the issue of whether there was a criminal conspiracy entered into and a part of the trump campaign. that goes right to the heart of that question. i don t think there s anything we have learned in the last 24, 48 hours that sheds any light on that. it certainly sheds light on the question of the nature of her of her and what she did. molly: you know, the house intelligence committee on friday declaring no evidence of collusion between the russian government and the trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election. both the democrats and republicans weighed in on this. if we could just listen for a moment. we spent over a year looking at this. we produced a 250 page report. we interviewed 75 people. we found no collusion between the trump campaign and the ru
has been to their best interest interests. tucker: these are questions that liberals used to worry about. and they ve stopped because they hate trump. everything is okay. you should care about carter page regardless of his iq, political affiliation, so this guy no one will stand up for him and for what? there is no evidence he did anything wrong. they believe they are using him as a dupe. he had that information since 2014 as part of the public statements he s made himself. tucker: once you ve implied he s working for russia, you better prove he did something wrong.
he said he was in regular communication with russian intelligence. tucker: martin luther king was under investigation. it s not a signifier of guilt. they believed tucker: where is it? i don t expect that to be public. tucker: i do at this point. i expect to know if you destroy a man s reputation, his livelihood, has capacity to support his family going forward, as a general carter page, you better tell mee how e support to american national security. the intelligence agencies believe he was a dupe of russian intelligence for many years, going back to 13 and the 14. the point of the matter tucker: do you think he was? h i don t have the informatio. tucker: does it bother you that an american citizen has been destroyed by our intel on the basis of no available evidence of wrongdoing? why wouldn tvi come as a civil libertarian, you would think, that could happen to you? i m not sure that his or her predatione. has been destroyed. tucker: carter page! he s