survive. none of these warnings have come true? yes. has credibility been hurt on the end vier row side? i think so. the problem with this issue, depending on what team you are on, you get a bucket debate. bob, you ll get your bucket, you ll fill it your data and i get mine and fill it with my data then we spend the next 12 minutes exchanging this data, and then the next day we forget completely about it. the only problem is the hysteria is actually worse than the calamity. because we are drawing danger to something that s less dangerous than other things. they are burning dung and burning twigs inside their houses, killing 4 million people. there are 3 billion people who
earth day. a question of survival. somehow, we survived since that earth day. most of life got better. some of it got better because we passed environmental rules and got the filth out of the air and the sewage out of the water. now we re told we re in big trouble because of greenhouse gases. most people i interviewed in washington d.c. believed that. we re not going to be able to survive in the same way that we have been all this time. we re not going to survive? please. odds are we will not only survive, but life will get better. even left wing environmentalists who say global warming is a real problem says industrialization will make things better. how? if you re poor, you have bad air. you have bad water and you die very soon. you have bad air because you may burn dung to heat your hut.
you have bad air because you may burn dung to heat your hut. exactly. pollution kills 4.3 million people each year. that s never what we talk about. we talk a lot about global warming. it is a real problem, it s something we need to fix but we need to get a sense of priority. by far the most important this evening is air pollution, indoor and outdoor air pollution and that s about getting people ot of poverty. america has reduced its greenhouse air emissions, fracking, which a lot of countries forbid. if you take all the solar panels and wind turbines out, they have cut less than what u.s. fracking has managed to do globally. that s worth pondering because
whiners. that s true. they would have gotten a big response to that a and probably not a positive one. well, what is wrong with driving around in an escalade? maybe he has manure to drive around. there is more room for the dung that way. exactly. and why did people really, the thing is that people were angry about this ad. this was an opportune nistic ad for ford. you go on the blog and huffington post they are all writing about how the ad was about greed. didn t i make my point? the man said it is not about the stuff. it is about being a hard working great american. you made your point. but i think what this comes down to and the reason you don t like the ford ad is you are racist. everyone is thinking it so i may as well say it. you know who is racist? all of the people complaining. we couldn t get enough of the white male of privilege. who is to say well he is a
the fantasizing here. the trying to turn dung into something nice. i mean, i don t know, something wonderful. but this is, to stand there and tell people, oh, no, the white house comes out with this answer from alice in wonderland, and it s just amazing. but you know, the republicans have nothing to counter. they have no economic program, no growth program. neither party, they all failed the country. on facebook says regulation has killed the job market, and an entrepreneur has to jump through too many hoops just to consider starting a business. that s his take on it. we asked people to comment. there s that on many regulations. on obamacare, we know that people are being reduced from full time to part time, from 40 hours to under 30 hours, which has angered big labor like crazy. and we have said on here, harris, why aren t the republicans reaching out to big labor and say, join us