a democratic electio to n is actually pro democratic. they re stealing our votes in broad daylight. where in the u.s. do you want to go to? i don t know the place. okay, so just an addressn in philadelphia to go to meet your new neighbors o go. good morning, my neighbor. might be time for me to gety fr away from all these, you know, liberal snowflakom e dating adve from jesse watters. was: dating three wise men. they all brought the gift. what did they bring them? diaperbroughs, pacifier and a bg . five years after the civil war, pro-slavery democrats filled the halls of congressr , and 15 years later, pro-slavery th actually flipped the house. 51 former confederate soldiers or officials were elected into office. even the viceor offic presidf the confederacy, alexander stephens, an arch secessionist ,landed a seat in congress. another confederate . volution lewis lamar, a great name who literally drafted the missouridrafte secession pl went on to serve as inte
here with me now is really time to time opinion columnist ellzey and former assistant special prosecutor nick akerman and michael cohen, donald trump s former fixer. guys, great to have you here. oh, i have to talk about your book, michael. you re also the author of revenge, how donald trump weaponize the u.s. department of justice against his critics. he s also the host of the podcast mea culpa. okay, we re pasture accomplishments, michael. now we can get to the segment. so lying to the grand jury. that sounds serious. it s absolutely serious. so now what? i think is gonna be an indictment coming out fairly shortly. i think you re going to see donald trump indicted. you re going to see a number of other people indicted that are involved in this whole plot in georgia. really? you think donald trump is going to be indicted? what clued into having? they re looking at the judge s opinion that came out, at least his first one, he talked about the fact that he wasn t
because of due process problems. a number of these defendants are people who were in this report, didn t have, they had the opportunity to come in and talk, but they didn t have an opportunity to put the other side of the story out there. but he also said that there was another group, and that group is really a group of one, that wasn t given the opportunity to come in. it says it right in that report. it just screams out at you that the only person that that could possibly relate to is donald trump. when do you think that would happen? i think it s going to happen soon. maybe not as soon as everybody thought, because the da there said it was going to be imminent. she was asked about this the other day when she left a hearing in the state legislature, and she said it s going to be legally eminent, not reporter imminent. but i think we re going to get it fairly soon.
the previous story and the push from the campuses. the university to destroy western tradition in the name of putting as many females as possible in power has not ended. this was an absolutely classic case of me to fanaticism taken to absurd heights. not only did it have the due process problems that you pointed out where he was railroaded, there was no opportunity to test the anonymous accusations against him. but let s look at the standard for what now constitutes career ending sexual harassment. one female said that he looked at me and said he was going to kiss me and it made me feel uncomfortable. therefore i was out of rest. if a female feels harassed, she is harassed. that subjective standard is ludicrous. then this photo taken of frank and pretending to go in for the
the first place. the issue is the vetting. why not tighten the vetting with or without a band and do it? it s supposed to be the heart of the issue. i was sure there was going to be some kind of intervention. there is. is it going to put it on hold? i think this issue is going to fade away because it has no impact. it was a response to a campaign promise and will have no impact in the long run. what s interesting about the order is they talked about the establishment clause. about whether this is a muslim ban or not. the administration is pretty confident it has a fixed due process problems with the first muslim ban. bret: they didn t call it a muslim ban. i m sorry. they didn t. there were problems with it and they fixed the due process problems but the question is whether it s a religious test. that s what the courts are going to say. bret: a member of the saudi