the ability to structure this case the way they were able to on some due process argument that wasn t clear enough to the defendant what was happening so that s very problematic though. it s not likely to happen nor is the governor likely to pardon, nor should she it would just be a pure political act at this point no mercy. yeah. you said that you think some jail time would be good for the former president? there is a kind of conventional wisdom that if he goes to jail, that will rally his voters, it will rally his base. do you think that s true? do you think you ll have a firmer argument about how he s being unfairly persecuted. or does that base have sort of a ceiling? i mean, he has a hold on on a certain segment of the population. it seems no matter what he asked about 30%, apparently of voters and there are people who just don t even want to know the facts. i have
do you think there should be term limits for supreme court justices? there has been a bill by cona congressman that we should look at. we have gone past the time in our country judges were truly judicial. they are now individuals that are selective, particularly on the republican side, by what s called the federalist so ciety and they have been screened around this particular issue and that of guns. and we ve seen two decisions come down in two days that overturn on the one side states ability to put conditions on concealed weapons and on the other hand take away the rights in roe and say we re shifting it to the states. they also said that if you re going to use the 14th amendment this right to privacy, this due process argument, you have to go
cosby could be guilty but at the same time free bid the legal system. here he is last night right here on fox. he had a deal and you have a due process argument and he detrimentally lied on that and the subsequent da ran a campaign that he would charge bill cosby. so it was a political motivation. they brought in 5 prior bad acts that cover a 20, 30-year period and they allowed that to be introduced in the current trial and basically you have to ask yourself, did the jury convict him on being a bad character, a bad person versus was he actually being convicted on the charge before them and i think the court got it right. bill cosby, a sexual monster, yes, did he proper i will go through the legal system and did he get vindication, absolutely. steve: according to tmz, apparently bill cosby heard from
actually holding a press conference at some point. john: on the way to get them out of prison. let s bring in terrel leo, 58 accusers, one of which went to trial, rested 12 days before the statute of limitations ran out on that case, and now he is going to be a free man in minutes, what are you thinking about all of this? i will tell you right now, john, shannon, i cover the trial when it came out a couple of years ago. do i believe that bill cosby is a predator? yes, no question about it. do i believe that the legal system did them wrong? absolutely, emily talked about it before, one, the deal that he made with the district attorney, he had a deal, and you have a due process argument, and he relied upon that. and the subsequent d.a. ran a campaign on that he was charged, bill cosby. so it was a political motivation, secondly, and prior
But the
Franklin court holds that all of that was a mirage. The exemption never really existed. The Supreme Court went back in time and snatched it from the Act before it ever took effect. So Navient can be liable after all.
No. I’m serious.
Here’s the analysis:
AAPC addressed only what the Act means going forward. But if the exception was void the day it was passed, and Congress’s fallback rule was to nix it, then it never took effect. As Justice Kavanaugh put it, the exception was “‘not law’ at all.” 140 S. Ct. at 2351 n.8 (quoting Marbury, 5 U.S. at 177).